Browse Search Feedback Other Links Home Home The Talk.Origins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy

Index to Creationist Claims,  edited by Mark Isaak,    Copyright © 2004
Previous Claim: CH102.1   |   List of Claims   |   Next Claim: CH102.2.1

Claim CH102.2:

Genesis must be literal because writers of later books of the Bible refer to it as fact.

Source:

Morris, Henry M., 1974. Scientific Creationism, Green Forest, AR: Master Books, pp. 244-247.

Response:

  1. Referring to something as fact does not mean it is fact. Writers often use metaphors. I have often seen writers refer to the story of blind men describing an elephant as if it were fact, for example, even though it is a fictional story.

  2. Even if the later writers thought what they were referring to was true, it may not have been. People mistake folklore for fact all the time.

Previous Claim: CH102.1   |   List of Claims   |   Next Claim: CH102.2.1

created 2003-6-17