Archaeology

@article{jack1932recent,
    author = "Jack, J.W.",
    title = "Recent Biblical Archeology",
    year = "1932",
    journal = "The Expository Times",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1177/001452463204400205",
    doi = "10.1177/001452463204400205",
    number = "2",
    openalex = "W4244284855",
    pages = "71-74",
    volume = "44"
}

@article{hammond1961the,
    author = "Hammond, Philip C. and Wright, G. Ernest and Freedman, David Noel",
    title = "The Biblical Archaeologist Reader",
    year = "1961",
    journal = "Journal of Biblical Literature",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/3264812",
    doi = "10.2307/3264812",
    number = "3",
    openalex = "W3194453736",
    pages = "302",
    volume = "80"
}

@book{wright1962biblical4,
    author = "Wright, G. E",
    title = "Biblical Archaeology [Rev. ed.]",
    year = "1962",
    publisher = "Philadelphia, Penn., Westminster Press",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Wright, G. E., 1962, Biblical Archaeology [Rev. ed.]: Philadelphia, Penn., Westminster Press.}"
}

@article{hammond1965the,
    author = "Hammond, Philip C. and Freedman, David Noel and Campbell, Edward F.",
    title = "The Biblical Archaeologist Reader",
    year = "1965",
    journal = "Journal of Biblical Literature",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/3264084",
    doi = "10.2307/3264084",
    number = "1",
    openalex = "W1547726129",
    pages = "93",
    volume = "84"
}

@misc{brandt1971astronomers1,
    author = "Brandt, J. C. and Marin, S. P. and Stecher, T. P",
    title = "Astronomers Ask Archaeologists Aid",
    year = "1971",
    howpublished = "Archaeology, v. 21, p. 360",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Brandt, J. C., Marin, S. P., and Stecher, T. P., 1971, Astronomers Ask Archaeologists Aid: Archaeology, v. 21, p. 360.}"
}

@book{bucha1971in2,
    author = "Bucha, V",
    title = "in Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K., eds., Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist",
    year = "1971",
    publisher = "Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, p. 57-117",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Bucha, V., 1971,, in Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K., eds., Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist: Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, p. 57-117.}"
}

@article{dunnell1986explaining,
    author = "Dunnell, Robert C.",
    title = "Explaining archaeology to archaeologists",
    year = "1986",
    journal = "Reviews in Anthropology",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1080/00988157.1986.9977759",
    doi = "10.1080/00988157.1986.9977759",
    number = "1",
    openalex = "W2092796711",
    pages = "46-55",
    volume = "13",
    references = "doi101016b9780120031030500071, doi101086jar3733629723, doi1023071594120, doi1023071894091, doi1023072063068, doi102307279244, doi102307588281, openalexw1606802182, openalexw1974359478, openalexw227636185"
}

@book{harrold1987cult3,
    author = "Harrold, F. B. and Eve, R. A",
    title = "Cult Archeology and Creationism",
    year = "1987",
    publisher = "Understanding Pseudoscientific Beliefs about the Past [1st ed.]: Iowa City, Iowa, University of Iowa Press, 163 p",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Harrold, F. B., and Eve, R. A., 1987, Cult Archeology and Creationism: Understanding Pseudoscientific Beliefs about the Past [1st ed.]: Iowa City, Iowa, University of Iowa Press, 163 p.}"
}

@incollection{crossref2003conclusion,
    title = "Conclusion: archaeology as archaeology",
    year = "2003",
    booktitle = "Reading the Past",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814211.013",
    doi = "10.1017/cbo9780511814211.013",
    pages = "236-247"
}

@article{bartlett2005book,
    author = "Bartlett, John R.",
    title = "Book Review: Archaeologists and Biblical Scholars; Between Text and Artifact: Integrating Archaeology in Biblical Studies Teaching",
    year = "2005",
    journal = "The Expository Times",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1177/001452460511600409",
    doi = "10.1177/001452460511600409",
    number = "4",
    openalex = "W1968821083",
    pages = "134-134",
    volume = "116"
}

@incollection{deagan2008environmental,
    author = "Deagan, Kathleen A.",
    title = "Environmental Archaeology and Historical Archaeology",
    year = "2008",
    booktitle = "Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71303-8\_2",
    doi = "10.1007/978-0-387-71303-8\_2",
    pages = "21-42"
}

@incollection{haber2015archaeology,
    author = "Haber, Alejandro",
    title = "Archaeology After Archaeology",
    year = "2015",
    booktitle = "After Ethics",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1689-4\_8",
    doi = "10.1007/978-1-4939-1689-4\_8",
    pages = "127-137"
}

@misc{crossref2018french,
    title = "French Archaeology and Archaeologists",
    year = "2018",
    booktitle = "Archaeology Hotspot France",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216419846.ch-004",
    doi = "10.5040/9798216419846.ch-004",
    openalex = "W4417366504",
    pages = "105-124"
}

@misc{gertvanwijngaarden2018troy,
    author = "Gert van Wijngaarden, Gert van Wijngaarden",
    title = "Troy: Archaeology of Archaeology",
    year = "2018",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.18258/10699",
    doi = "10.18258/10699"
}

This article considers the impact of both historical and digital transhuman practices in archaeology with an eye towards recent conversations concerning punk archaeology, slow archaeology, and an ‘archaeology of care’. Drawing on Ivan Illich, Jacques Ellul, and Gilles Deleuze, the article suggests that current trends in digital practices risk alienating archaeological labour and de-territorializing archaeological work.

@article{caraher2019slow,
    author = "Caraher, William",
    title = "Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care’",
    year = "2019",
    journal = "European Journal of Archaeology",
    abstract = "This article considers the impact of both historical and digital transhuman practices in archaeology with an eye towards recent conversations concerning punk archaeology, slow archaeology, and an ‘archaeology of care’. Drawing on Ivan Illich, Jacques Ellul, and Gilles Deleuze, the article suggests that current trends in digital practices risk alienating archaeological labour and de-territorializing archaeological work.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2019.15",
    doi = "10.1017/eaa.2019.15",
    number = "3",
    pages = "372-385",
    volume = "22"
}

@incollection{dark2020archaeology,
    author = "Dark, Ken",
    title = "Archaeology without archaeologists",
    year = "2020",
    booktitle = "The Sisters of Nazareth Convent",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003088240-2",
    doi = "10.4324/9781003088240-2",
    openalex = "W3047492045",
    pages = "10-31",
    references = "openalexw640330199"
}

This chapter tells the story of how the author became involved in the archaeology of Nazareth, and especially how he came to direct fieldwork from 2006 to 2010 on the famous ‘House of Jesus’ at the Sisters of Nazareth site. This is a more personal account of the project than any previously published extended description, discussing the background and initial establishment of the author’s archaeological research project on Nazareth and its immediate surroundings (the Nazareth Archaeological Project) in narrative form. It also corrects media and other misconceptions about the motivation and rationale for this project, and the sort of people involved in it.

@incollection{dark2023an,
    author = "Dark, Ken",
    title = "An accidental biblical archaeologist?",
    year = "2023",
    booktitle = "Archaeology of Jesus' Nazareth",
    abstract = "This chapter tells the story of how the author became involved in the archaeology of Nazareth, and especially how he came to direct fieldwork from 2006 to 2010 on the famous ‘House of Jesus’ at the Sisters of Nazareth site. This is a more personal account of the project than any previously published extended description, discussing the background and initial establishment of the author’s archaeological research project on Nazareth and its immediate surroundings (the Nazareth Archaeological Project) in narrative form. It also corrects media and other misconceptions about the motivation and rationale for this project, and the sort of people involved in it.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865397.003.0001",
    doi = "10.1093/oso/9780192865397.003.0001",
    openalex = "W4317368686",
    pages = "1-22"
}

@incollection{gerritsen2024archaeology,
    author = "GERRITSEN, Vita and van WIJNGAARDEN, Gert Jan and ASLAN, Rüstem",
    title = "ARCHAEOLOGY OF ARCHAEOLOGY:",
    year = "2024",
    booktitle = "IXNH. Walking in the Footsteps of the Pioneer of Aegean Archaeology in celebration of the 200th anniversary of the birth of Heinrich Schliemann",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.14799938.11",
    doi = "10.2307/jj.14799938.11",
    pages = "65-72"
}

This dissertation focuses on the sociotechnical aspect of knowledge production in multidisciplinary, collaborative, and data-intensive scholarly practices, specifically focusing on the archaeological communities of practice. This research explores the logico-scientific and the narrative modes of knowing in the practice of archaeology. Much research has focused on the logico-scientific mode while little work has been done on the narrative mode of knowing. Drawing on theories developed in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and ethnographic and qualitative methods, archaeological narrative construction has been investigated at three levels. Based on theories of Communities of Practice (CoP) and Networks of Practice (NoP), this study presents an expanded conceptualization of archaeological NoP as a nexus of materially-mediated activities, which spans multiple CoPs. Three configurations of practice as Organizational CoPs, Disciplinary CoPs and NoPs are suggested. The process of archaeological knowledge production is conceptualized as the emergence of epistemic objects which are created in response to the breakdowns resulted from the observation of anomalies. The wider adoption of epistemic objects depends upon the researcher's ability to develop and stabilize a compelling theoretical narrative. The study findings suggest that the success of such narratives depends on the enrollment of allies through two strategies of reinforcement and expansion. Information recording objects play a crucial role in both strategies. The wider acceptance of a stabilized narrative in the global Networks of Practice, then, depends on the socio-political processes of the NoPs and the struggles for domination among power positions in the network as well as the larger cultural narratives. The deeper understanding of knowledge-in-practice achieved by this study will help us better address the design requirements of complex information ecologies for interpretive, multidisciplinary, and data-intensive practices such as archaeology.

@misc{andkhazraeeafzaliNonearchaeology,
    author = "Khazraee Afzali, Seyed Emad Adin and Gasson, Susan",
    title = "Archaeology of archaeology",
    year = "None",
    abstract = "This dissertation focuses on the sociotechnical aspect of knowledge production in multidisciplinary, collaborative, and data-intensive scholarly practices, specifically focusing on the archaeological communities of practice. This research explores the logico-scientific and the narrative modes of knowing in the practice of archaeology. Much research has focused on the logico-scientific mode while little work has been done on the narrative mode of knowing. Drawing on theories developed in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and ethnographic and qualitative methods, archaeological narrative construction has been investigated at three levels. Based on theories of Communities of Practice (CoP) and Networks of Practice (NoP), this study presents an expanded conceptualization of archaeological NoP as a nexus of materially-mediated activities, which spans multiple CoPs. Three configurations of practice as Organizational CoPs, Disciplinary CoPs and NoPs are suggested. The process of archaeological knowledge production is conceptualized as the emergence of epistemic objects which are created in response to the breakdowns resulted from the observation of anomalies. The wider adoption of epistemic objects depends upon the researcher's ability to develop and stabilize a compelling theoretical narrative. The study findings suggest that the success of such narratives depends on the enrollment of allies through two strategies of reinforcement and expansion. Information recording objects play a crucial role in both strategies. The wider acceptance of a stabilized narrative in the global Networks of Practice, then, depends on the socio-political processes of the NoPs and the struggles for domination among power positions in the network as well as the larger cultural narratives. The deeper understanding of knowledge-in-practice achieved by this study will help us better address the design requirements of complex information ecologies for interpretive, multidisciplinary, and data-intensive practices such as archaeology.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.17918/etd-6722",
    doi = "10.17918/etd-6722"
}