@misc{cravens1978the,
    author = "Cravens, Hamilton",
    title = "The Triumph of Evolution",
    year = "1978",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512815351",
    doi = "10.9783/9781512815351",
    openalex = "W2157707959"
}

@misc{gould1986evolution1,
    author = "Gould, S. J",
    title = "Evolution and the triumph of homology, or why history matters",
    year = "1986",
    howpublished = "American Scientist, p. 60-69",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Gould, S. J., 1986, Evolution and the triumph of homology, or why history matters: American Scientist, p. 60-69.}"
}

@article{openalexw1649242647,
    author = "Gould, Stephen Jay",
    title = "Evolution and the Triumph of Homology, or Why History Matters",
    year = "1986",
    journal = "AmSci",
    abstract = "In 1912, when the nation both needed and still had a good five cent cigar, Sigma Xi spent three dollars to rent a hall for its annual banquet. Receipts for 1912 totaled $646.42 against expenses of $160.22 (including that three bucks), leaving a balance of $486.20, a fine improvement from the 1911 surplus of $295.67. Our society then included 8,200 members, 2,176 listed as active. In that year, Sigma Xi also decided, for the first time, to publish a journal, the Sigma Xi Quarterly (renamed American Scientist in 1942). In his //Salutatory,, to the very first issue, president (and paleontologist) S. W. WUliston wrote on page 1, volume 1, number 1: Since its begin ning Sigma Xi has stood for the encouragement of investigation, of research, rather mmmtmmmiim^^^^mii than for the mere acquisition of knowledge. In 1886 the founders of Sigma Xi had chosen for their motto Com panions in Zealous Research?a phrase that we have happily retained despite its archaic ring. The original zealots were an uncompromising lot. Some roamed public places with hid den daggers to strike down support ers of Rome; others committed mass suicide at Masada. They were, above all, men of action?the doers of their generation. Our founders chose their mmmi^l^mm?mmm words well. Science is doing, not just clever thinking. As Williston noted, our society stands for action expressed as research. I have been assigned the impossible task of encap sulating the intellectual impact of evolution, both on other sciences and upon society in general, during the past 100 years. I have chosen this fundamental definition of Sigma Xi as prologue because I want to argue that Darwin's most enduring impact has generally been underestimated (or underesteemed). I will hold that his theory is, first and foremost, a guide to action in research?the first workable program ever presented for evolution. Darwin was, above all, a historical methodolo gist. His theory taught us the importance of history, expressed in doing as the triumph of homology over other causes of order. History is science of a different kind?pursued, when done well, with all the power and rigor ascribed to more traditional styles of science.",
    url = "https://openalex.org/W1649242647",
    openalex = "W1649242647",
    references = "alvarez1980extraterrestrial, doi101073pnas813801, doi1015159781400881376, doi1023071437762, doi1023072806339, doi105860choice342458, doi105962bhltitle122451, doi107208chicago97802263088830010001, openalexw2041681298, openalexw3135630760"
}

@article{s2c17f28bc25b1241d07def33c916b5fbab745bf27,
    author = "Gould, S.",
    title = "Evolution and the Triumph of Homology, or Why History Matters",
    year = "1986",
    journal = "AmSci",
    abstract = "In 1912, when the nation both needed and still had a good five cent cigar, Sigma Xi spent three dollars to rent a hall for its annual banquet. Receipts for 1912 totaled $646.42 against expenses of $160.22 (including that three bucks), leaving a balance of $486.20, a fine improvement from the 1911 surplus of $295.67. Our society then included 8,200 members, 2,176 listed as active. In that year, Sigma Xi also decided, for the first time, to publish a journal, the Sigma Xi Quarterly (renamed American Scientist in 1942). In his //Salutatory,, to the very first issue, president (and paleontologist) S. W. WUliston wrote on page 1, volume 1, number 1: Since its begin ning Sigma Xi has stood for the encouragement of investigation, of research, rather mmmtmmmiim^^^^mii than for the mere acquisition of knowledge. In 1886 the founders of Sigma Xi had chosen for their motto Com panions in Zealous Research?a phrase that we have happily retained despite its archaic ring. The original zealots were an uncompromising lot. Some roamed public places with hid den daggers to strike down support ers of Rome; others committed mass suicide at Masada. They were, above all, men of action?the doers of their generation. Our founders chose their mmmi^l^mm?mmm words well. Science is doing, not just clever thinking. As Williston noted, our society stands for action expressed as research. I have been assigned the impossible task of encap sulating the intellectual impact of evolution, both on other sciences and upon society in general, during the past 100 years. I have chosen this fundamental definition of Sigma Xi as prologue because I want to argue that Darwin's most enduring impact has generally been underestimated (or underesteemed). I will hold that his theory is, first and foremost, a guide to action in research?the first workable program ever presented for evolution. Darwin was, above all, a historical methodolo gist. His theory taught us the importance of history, expressed in doing as the triumph of homology over other causes of order. History is science of a different kind?pursued, when done well, with all the power and rigor ascribed to more traditional styles of science.",
    url = "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c17f28bc25b1241d07def33c916b5fbab745bf27",
    is_oa = "true",
    openalex = "W1649242647",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "243",
    semanticscholar_id = "c17f28bc25b1241d07def33c916b5fbab745bf27",
    references = "doi1023071868881"
}

@article{doi101086203547,
    author = "Kirch, Patrick Vinton and Green, Roger C. and Bellwood, Peter and Dunnell, Robert C. and Dye, Tom and Gosden, Chris and Rowe, Chandler W. and Terrell, John Edward and Vogt, Evon Z. and Welsch, Robert L. and White, Raplh Gardner",
    title = "History, Phylogeny, and Evolution in Polynesia [and Comments and Reply]",
    year = "1987",
    journal = "Current Anthropology",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1086/203547",
    doi = "10.1086/203547",
    openalex = "W2272576230"
}

@article{doi101111j109600311991tb00045x,
    author = "de Pinna, Mário C. C.",
    title = "CONCEPTS AND TESTS OF HOMOLOGY IN THE CLADISTIC PARADIGM",
    year = "1991",
    journal = "Cladistics",
    abstract = "Abstract— Logical equivalence between the notions of homology and synapomorphy is reviewed and supported. So‐called transformational homology embodies two distinct logical components, one related to comparisons among different organisms and the other restricted to comparisons within the same organism. The former is essentially hierarchical in nature, thus being in fact a less obvious form of taxic homology. The latter is logically equivalent to so‐called serial homology in a broad sense (including homonomy, mass homology or iterative homology). Of three tests of homology proposed to date (similarity, conjunction and congruence) only congruence serves as a test in the strict sense. Similarity stands at a basic level in homology propositions, being the source of the homology conjecture in the first place. Conjunction is unquestionably an indicator of non‐homology, but it is not specific about the pairwise comparison where non‐homology is present, and depends on a specific scheme of relationship in order to refute a hypothesis of homology. The congruence test has been previously seen as an application of compatibility analysis. However, congruence is more appropriately seen as an expression of strict parsimony analysis. A general theoretical solution is proposed to determine evolution of characters with ambiguous distributions, based on the notion of maximization of homology propositions. According to that notion, ambiguous character‐state distributions should be resolved by an optimization that maximizes reversals relative to parallelisms. Notions of homology in morphology and molecular biology are essentially the same. The present tendency to adopt different terminologies for the two sources of data should be avoided, in order not to obscure the fundamental uniformity of the concept of homology in comparative biology. “A similar hierarchy is found both in ‘structures’ and in ‘functions’. In the last resort, structure (i.e. order of parts) and function (order of processes) may be the very same thing […].” L. von Bertalanlfy “[…] it is the fact that certain criteria enable us to match parts of things consistently which suggests that mechanisms of certain kinds must have been involved in their origin.” N. Jardine and C. Jardine",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1991.tb00045.x",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1096-0031.1991.tb00045.x",
    openalex = "W2142398288",
    references = "doi101007bf02603120, doi101093sysbio19183, doi101093sysbio242233, doi101126science7280687, doi101146annureven10010165000525, doi1023072411550, doi1023072412028, doi1023072412448, doi1023072413454, doi1023072806339, doi1023072992444, doi107312crac92306005, openalexw1988829823, openalexw3184837389"
}

@article{doi101086204023,
    author = "Kirch, Patrick Vinton and Green, Roger C.",
    title = "History, Phylogeny, and Evolution in Polynesia",
    year = "1992",
    journal = "Current Anthropology",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1086/204023",
    doi = "10.1086/204023",
    openalex = "W2138699031"
}

@article{s235029f5db5b6d3d590c9fbc83f1a9ff86ff64b69,
    author = "Slatkin, M.",
    title = "Exploring evolutionary biology : readings from American scientist",
    year = "1995",
    booktitle = "Sinauer Associates eBooks",
    abstract = "Part 1 Decoding the fossil record: early life on land, Jane Gray and William Shear the evolution of early land plants, Patricia G. Gensel and Henry N. Andrewsm evolution of the early vertebrates, Peter Forey and Philippe Janvier where did tetrapods come from?, Keith Stewart Thompson extraordinary fossils, Derek E.G. Briggs taphonomy and the fossil record, Anna K. Behrensmeyer what killed the dinosaurs?, William Glen recent animal extinctions - recipes for disaster, David A. Burney land mammals and the great American interchange, Larry G. Marshall. Part 2 Interpreting patterns: cladistic analysis and vicariance biogeography, Joel Cracraft evolution and the triumph of homology, or why history matters, Stephen Jay Gould the evolution of life without oxygen, Tom Fenchel and Bland J. Finlay the origin of the life cycle of land plants, Linda E. Graham the early evolution of the domestic dog, Darcy F. Morey Giardia - a missing link between prokaryotes and eukaryotes, Karen S, Kabnick and Debra A. Peattie troglobites - the evolution of cave-dwelling organisms, John R. Holsinger evolutionary relationships of the coelacanth, Thomas Gorr and Traute Kleinschmidt. Part 3 Genetics and evolution: the adaptive importance of genetic variation, Richard K. Koehn and Thomas J. Hibish the evolutionary potential of crop pests, Fred Gould Fisher's microscope, or the gradualist's dilemma, Keith Stewart Thompson directed evolution reconsidered, Donald MacPheem updating the theory of mutation, John W. Drake, Barry W. Glickman and Lynn S. Ripley development and evolution in amphibians, James Hanken. Part 4 Sex and behaviour: evolution of sexual differences in insects, Randy Thornhill and Darryl T. Gwynne female choice in mating, Meredith F. Small signals, species and sexual selection, Michael Ryan spider fights as a test of evolutionary game theory, Susan E. Riechert untangling the evolution of the web, William A. Shear naked mole rats, Rodney L. Honeycutt the evolution of primate behaviour, Alison Jolly the monkey and the fig, Stuart A. Altmann.",
    url = "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35029f5db5b6d3d590c9fbc83f1a9ff86ff64b69",
    is_oa = "true",
    openalex = "W584369441",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "3",
    semanticscholar_id = "35029f5db5b6d3d590c9fbc83f1a9ff86ff64b69"
}

@article{doi1023072265575,
    author = "Waser, Nikolas M. and Chıttka, Lars and Price, Mary V. and Williams, Neal M. and Ollerton, Jeff",
    title = "Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters",
    year = "1996",
    journal = "Ecology",
    abstract = {One view of pollination systems is that they tend toward specialization. This view is implicit in many discussions of angiosperm evolution and plant—pollinator coevolution and in the long—standing concept of p ollination syndromes. But actual pollination systems often are more generalized and dynamic than these traditions might suggest. To illustrate the range of specialization and generalization in pollinators' use of plants and vice versa, we draw on studies of two floras in the United States, and of members of several plant families and solitary bee genera. We also summarize a recent study of one local flora which suggests that, although the colors of flowers are aggregated in p henotype space, there is no strong association with pollinator types as pollination syndromes would predict. That moderate to substantial generalization often occurs is not surprising on theoretical grounds. Plant generalization is predicted by a simple model as long as temporal and spatial variance in pollinator quality is appreciable, different pollinator species do not fluctuate in unison, and they are similar in their pollination effectiveness. Pollinator generalization is predicted when floral rewards are similar across plant species, travel is costly, constraints of behavior and morphology are minor, and/or pollinator lifespan is long relative to flowering of individual plant species. Recognizing that pollination systems often are generalized has important implications. In ecological predictions of plant reproductive success and population dynamics it is useful to widen the focus beyond flower visitors within the c orrect" pollination syndrome, and to recognize temporal and spatial fluidity of interactions. Behavioral studies of pollinator foraging choices and information—processing abilities will benefit from understanding the selective advantages of generalization. In studies of floral adaptation, microevolution, and plant speciation one should recognize that selection and gene flow vary in time and space and that the contribution of pollinators to reproductive isolation of plant species may be overstated. In conservation biology, generalized pollination systems imply resilience to linked extinctions, but also the possibility for introduced generalists to displace natives with a net loss of diversity.},
    url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/2265575",
    doi = "10.2307/2265575",
    openalex = "W2000844300"
}

@article{doi101016s0160932700020597,
    author = "Mangel, M.",
    title = "The Triumph of Evolution… and the Failure of Creationism",
    year = "2001",
    journal = "Endeavour",
    url = "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51acea584c79e3e043d1b7d9e5fbfdd662528848",
    doi = "10.1016/S0160-9327(00)02059-7",
    is_oa = "true",
    number = "1",
    pages = "40-41",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "30",
    semanticscholar_id = "51acea584c79e3e043d1b7d9e5fbfdd662528848",
    volume = "25"
}

@article{doi101177146349960100100105,
    author = "Paüketat, Timothy R.",
    title = "Practice and history in archaeology",
    year = "2001",
    journal = "Anthropological Theory",
    abstract = "A new paradigm is emerging in archaeology herein dubbed ‘historical processualism’. A review of three contemporary approaches to the study of the past – neo-Darwinism, cognitive-processualism, and agency theory – suggests that the standard notions of ‘behavior’ and ‘evolution’ are being replaced in archaeological explanations by ‘practice’ and ‘history’. Behavioral analogies, commonly used to construct inferences about ‘why’ cultures changed, are problematic. In their place, archaeologists should substitute the study of cultural practices – what people did and how they negotiated their views of others and of their own pasts – as these were and are the actual processes of cultural change. The emphasis on practice entails the elevation of historical explanations, in the process altering the questions that archaeologists ask and the data that they must gather to address those questions. The importance of this paradigmatic shift is exemplified by contrasting contemporary explanations of Mississippian pottery and political change in the pre-Columbian American midcontinent.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1177/146349960100100105",
    doi = "10.1177/146349960100100105",
    openalex = "W2046772516",
    references = "doi102307282137"
}

@incollection{crossref20079,
    title = "9. The Triumph of History",
    year = "2007",
    booktitle = "The Roman Triumph",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020597-010",
    doi = "10.4159/9780674020597-010",
    openalex = "W2479664729",
    pages = "287-330"
}

@article{crossref2009the,
    title = "The Birds and the Dinosaurs",
    year = "2009",
    journal = "Science",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.324\_565d",
    doi = "10.1126/science.324\_565d",
    number = "5927",
    pages = "565-565",
    volume = "324"
}

@article{doi101126scienceaab3884,
    author = "Raghavan, Maanasa and Steinrücken, Matthias and Harris, Kelley and Schiffels, Stephan and Rasmussen, Simon and DeGiorgio, Michael and Albrechtsen, Anders and Valdiosera, Cristina and Ávila‐Arcos, María C. and Malaspinas, Anna‐Sapfo and Eriksson, Anders and Moltke, Ida and Metspalu, Mait and Homburger, Julian R. and Wall, Jeff and Cornejo, Omar E. and Moreno-Mayar, J. Víctor and Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand and Pierre, Tracey and Rasmussen, Morten and Campos, Paula F. and de Barros Damgaard, Peter and Allentoft, Morten E. and Lindo, John and Metspalu, Ene and Varela, Ricardo and Lory, Josefina Mansilla and Henrickson, Celeste and Seguin‐Orlando, Andaine and Malmström, Helena and Stafford, Thomas and Shringarpure, Suyash and Moreno‐Estrada, Andrés and Karmin, Monika and Tambets, Kristiina and Bergström, Anders and Xue, Yali and Warmuth, Vera and Friend, A. D. and Singarayer, Joy and Valdes, Paul J. and Balloux, François and Leboreiro, Ilán and Vera, José Luis and Rangel‐Villalobos, Héctor and Pettener, Davide and Luiselli, Donata and Davis, Loren G. and Heyer, Évelyne and Zollikofer, Christoph P. E. and de León, Marcia S. Ponce and Smith, Colin and Grimes, Vaughan and Pike, Kelly-Anne and Deal, Michael and Fuller, Benjamin T. and Arriaza, Bernardo and Standen, Vivien G. and Luz, Maria Francisca and Ricaut, François‐Xavier and Guidon, Niède and Osipova, L. P. and Voevoda, Mikhail I. and Posukh, Olga L. and Balanovsky, Oleg and Lavryashina, Maria and Bogunov, Yuri and Хуснутдинова, Э. К. and Gubina, Marina and Balanovska, Elena and Федорова, С.А. and Litvinov, Sergey and Malyarchuk, B. А. and Деренко, М. В. and Mosher, M. J. and Archer, David and Cybulski, Jerome S. and Petzelt, Barbara and Mitchell, Joycelynn and Worl, Rosita and Norman, Paul J. and Parham, Peter and Kemp, Brian M. and Kivisild, Toomas and Tyler-Smith, Chris and Sandhu, Manjinder S. and Crawford, Michael and Villems, Richard and Smith, David Glenn and Waters, Michael R. and Goebel, Ted and Johnson, John R. and Malhi, Ripan S. and Jakobsson, Mattias and Meltzer, David J. and Manica, Andrea and Durbin, Richard and Bustamante, Carlos D. and Song, Yun S. and Nielsen, Rasmus",
    title = "Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history of Native Americans",
    year = "2015",
    journal = "Science",
    abstract = {How and when the Americas were populated remains contentious. Using ancient and modern genome-wide data, we found that the ancestors of all present-day Native Americans, including Athabascans and Amerindians, entered the Americas as a single migration wave from Siberia no earlier than 23 thousand years ago (ka) and after no more than an 8000-year isolation period in Beringia. After their arrival to the Americas, ancestral Native Americans diversified into two basal genetic branches around 13 ka, one that is now dispersed across North and South America and the other restricted to North America. Subsequent gene flow resulted in some Native Americans sharing ancestry with present-day East Asians (including Siberians) and, more distantly, Australo-Melanesians. Putative "Paleoamerican" relict populations, including the historical Mexican Pericúes and South American Fuego-Patagonians, are not directly related to modern Australo-Melanesians as suggested by the Paleoamerican Model.},
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3884",
    doi = "10.1126/science.aab3884",
    openalex = "W2104124522",
    references = "doi101002ajpa1330380609"
}

@misc{s212b65bcdcae15ed09b4d77c77f94461affcbad3b,
    author = "khizri, Ahmadreza and foladipanah, Azam",
    title = "The Term of Hawza Ilmiyya : A History of its Appearance and the Semantic Evolution",
    year = "2015",
    url = "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12b65bcdcae15ed09b4d77c77f94461affcbad3b",
    is_oa = "true",
    semanticscholar_id = "12b65bcdcae15ed09b4d77c77f94461affcbad3b"
}

@article{doi101093mnrasstx875,
    author = "Frigo, Matteo and Balcells, M.",
    title = "Dynamical masses and non-homology of massive elliptical galaxies grown by dry mergers",
    year = "2016",
    journal = "arXiv: Astrophysics of Galaxies",
    abstract = "We study whether dry merger-driven size growth of massive elliptical galaxies depends on their initial structural concentration, and analyse the validity of the homology hypothesis for virial mass determination in massive ellipticals grown by dry mergers. High-resolution simulations of a few realistic merger trees, starting with compact progenitors of different structural concentrations (S\'ersic indices n), show that galaxy growth has little dependence on the initial S\'ersic index (larger n leads to slightly larger size growth), and depends more on other particulars of the merger history. We show that the deposition of accreted matter in the outer parts leads to a systematic and predictable breaking of the homology between remnants and progenitors, which we characterize through the evolution, during the course of the merger history, of virial coefficients K = GM/Re \sigma^2 associated to the most commonly-used dynamical and stellar mass parameters. The virial coefficient for the luminous mass, K , is about 50 per cent larger at the z = 2 start of the merger evolution than in z = 0 remnants. Ignoring virial evolution leads to biased virial mass estimates. We provide K corresponding to a variety of dynamical and stellar mass parameters, and provide recipes for the dynamical determination of galaxy masses. For massive, non-compact ellipticals, the popular expression M = 5 Re \sigma^2 / G underestimates the dynamical mass within the luminous body by factors of up to 4; it instead provides an approximation to the total stellar mass with smaller uncertainty than current stellar population models.",
    url = "http://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.01662",
    doi = "10.1093/mnras/stx875",
    is_oa = "true",
    number = "2",
    pages = "2184-2201",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "7",
    semanticscholar_id = "5a5fc808f1ef38ce47e3c561322e2c107c2a0e6a",
    volume = "469"
}

@article{doi101007s4065601701768,
    author = "Gradmann, C.",
    title = "From lighthouse to hothouse: hospital hygiene, antibiotics and the evolution of infectious disease, 1950–1990",
    year = "2017",
    journal = "History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences",
    url = "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8900ce0a177bf2cfecefbdd6f19ada86c0e92957",
    doi = "10.1007/s40656-017-0176-8",
    is_oa = "true",
    number = "1",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "23",
    semanticscholar_id = "8900ce0a177bf2cfecefbdd6f19ada86c0e92957",
    volume = "40"
}

@article{doi101186s13227020001658,
    author = "Angel, Juan A. Arias Del and Nanjundiah, V. and Benítez, M. and Newman, S.",
    title = "Interplay of mesoscale physics and agent-like behaviors in the parallel evolution of aggregative multicellularity",
    year = "2020",
    journal = "EvoDevo",
    abstract = "Myxobacteria and dictyostelids are prokaryotic and eukaryotic multicellular lineages, respectively, that after nutrient depletion aggregate and develop into structures called fruiting bodies. The developmental processes and resulting morphological outcomes resemble one another to a remarkable extent despite their independent origins, the evolutionary distance between them and the lack of traceable homology in molecular mechanisms. We hypothesize that the morphological parallelism between the two lineages arises as the consequence of the interplay within multicellular aggregates between generic processes , physical and physicochemical processes operating similarly in living and non-living matter at the mesoscale (\textasciitilde 10 –3 –10 –1  m) and agent-like behaviors , unique to living systems and characteristic of the constituent cells, considered as autonomous entities acting according to internal rules in a shared environment. Here, we analyze the contributions of generic and agent-like determinants in myxobacteria and dictyostelid development and their roles in the generation of their common traits. Consequent to aggregation, collective cell–cell contacts mediate the emergence of liquid-like properties, making nascent multicellular masses subject to novel patterning and morphogenetic processes. In both lineages, this leads to behaviors such as streaming, rippling, and rounding-up, as seen in non-living fluids. Later the aggregates solidify, leading them to exhibit additional generic properties and motifs. Computational models suggest that the morphological phenotypes of the multicellular masses deviate from the predictions of generic physics due to the contribution of agent-like behaviors of cells such as directed migration, quiescence, and oscillatory signal transduction mediated by responses to external cues. These employ signaling mechanisms that reflect the evolutionary histories of the respective organisms. We propose that the similar developmental trajectories of myxobacteria and dictyostelids are more due to shared generic physical processes in coordination with analogous agent-type behaviors than to convergent evolution under parallel selection regimes. Insights from the biology of these aggregative forms may enable a unified understanding of developmental evolution, including that of animals and plants.",
    url = "https://evodevojournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13227-020-00165-8",
    doi = "10.1186/s13227-020-00165-8",
    is_oa = "true",
    number = "1",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "31",
    semanticscholar_id = "1aca7fa8904943f315b27acdfa5ce11a7af2f5b8",
    volume = "11"
}

@article{doi101002jmor21569,
    author = "Rusin, L.",
    title = "Evolution of homology: From archetype towards a holistic concept of cell type",
    year = "2023",
    journal = "Journal of Morphology",
    abstract = "The concept of homology lies in the heart of comparative biological science. The distinction between homology as structure and analogy as function has shaped the evolutionary paradigm for a century and formed the axis of comparative anatomy and embryology, which accept the identity of structure as a ground measure of relatedness. The advent of single‐cell genomics overturned the classical view of cell homology by establishing a backbone regulatory identity of cell types, the basic biological units bridging the molecular and phenotypic dimensions, to reveal that the cell is the most flexible unit of living matter and that many approaches of classical biology need to be revised to understand evolution and diversity at the cellular level. The emerging theory of cell types explicitly decouples cell identity from phenotype, essentially allowing for the divergence of evolutionarily related morphotypes beyond recognition, as well as it decouples ontogenetic cell lineage from cell‐type phylogeny, whereby explicating that cell types can share common descent regardless of their structure, function or developmental origin. The article succinctly summarizes current progress and opinion in this field and formulates a more generalistic view of biological cell types as avatars, transient or terminal cell states deployed in a continuum of states by the developmental programme of one and the same omnipotent cell, capable of changing or combining identities with distinct evolutionary histories or inventing ad hoc identities that never existed in evolution or development. It highlights how the new logic grounded in the regulatory nature of cell identity transforms the concepts of cell homology and phenotypic stability, suggesting that cellular evolution is inherently and massively network‐like, with one‐to‐one homologies being rather uncommon and restricted to shallower levels of the animal tree of life.",
    url = "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1499a5130190c3307c4dccfe93507c06ff1478c",
    doi = "10.1002/jmor.21569",
    is_oa = "true",
    number = "4",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "6",
    semanticscholar_id = "c1499a5130190c3307c4dccfe93507c06ff1478c",
    volume = "284",
    references = "doi101007s1169202209567z"
}

@article{doi1010800210939520232253111,
    author = "del Río, Pablo and Álvarez, A.",
    title = "Humanism or transhumanism? Scissions of thought and the technological drift of science, a crisis for psychology (¿Humanismo o transhumanismo? Las escisiones del pensamiento y la deriva tecnológica de la ciencia, una crisis para la psicología)",
    year = "2023",
    journal = "Studies in Psychology",
    abstract = "This article argues that there is a crisis in the conception of what is human, resulting from the growing tendency to uncritically accept the assumptions of the technological paradigm or episteme and the model of the future that this approach takes for granted. In the authors’ opinion, this state of affairs derives from successive scissions that have taken place in the history of our development as a species (the scission of the cerebral hemispheres) and in the history of thought and science (first-order cybernetics versus second-order cybernetics; inert matter versus living matter; the technological versus the organic; natural intelligence versus artificial intelligence). In the face of the apparent triumph of the mechanistic assumptions that support transhumanism, the principles that have governed the origin and evolution of life are recalled, as well as the constitutive principles of the human psyche, among which the construction of consciousness and freedom, called for from Vygotskian Acmeist psychology, should be highlighted. These principles are those which, in the authors’ opinion, should govern any alternative for the future.",
    url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02109395.2023.2253111?needAccess=true",
    doi = "10.1080/02109395.2023.2253111",
    is_oa = "true",
    number = "2-3",
    pages = "157-251",
    semanticscholar_citation_count = "1",
    semanticscholar_id = "ea7fb842f436c8cc8bb15c25a781fac190b40234",
    volume = "44"
}

@incollection{braunNonehistory,
    author = "Braun, Erik",
    title = "History Matters",
    year = "None",
    booktitle = "International Place Branding Yearbook 2011",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343320.0012",
    doi = "10.1057/9780230343320.0012",
    openalex = "W4256025711"
}