@inproceedings{huxley1880on3,
    author = "Huxley, T. H",
    title = "On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia",
    year = "1880",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 43, p. 649-661",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Huxley, T. H., 1880, On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, v. 43, p. 649-661.}"
}

@misc{huxley1885the4,
    author = "Huxley, T. H",
    title = "The interpreters of Genesis and the interpreters of Nature",
    year = "1885",
    howpublished = "The Nineteenth Century",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Huxley, T. H., 1885, The interpreters of Genesis and the interpreters of Nature: The Nineteenth Century.}"
}

@misc{huxley1888the5,
    author = "Huxley, T. H",
    title = "The struggle for existance in human society",
    year = "1888",
    howpublished = "The Nineteenth Century",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Huxley, T. H., 1888, The struggle for existance in human society: The Nineteenth Century.}"
}

@misc{huxley1896mr7,
    author = "Huxley, T. H",
    title = "Mr. Gladstone and Genesis",
    year = "1896",
    howpublished = "The Nineteenth Century",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Huxley, T. H., 1896, Mr. Gladstone and Genesis: The Nineteenth Century.}"
}

@misc{huxley1896science6,
    author = "Huxley, T. H",
    title = "Science and education",
    year = "1896",
    howpublished = "New York, Appleton \& Co",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Huxley, T. H., 1896, Science and education: New York, Appleton \& Co.}"
}

@article{huxley1900life2,
    author = "Huxley, L",
    title = "Life and Letters of Thomas H. Huxley",
    year = "1900",
    journal = "New York, D. Appleton and Co., v. 2",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Huxley, L., 1900, Life and Letters of Thomas H. Huxley: New York, D. Appleton and Co., v. 2.}"
}

@article{huxley1927on1,
    author = "Huxley, J",
    title = "On the relation between egg-weight and body-weight in birds",
    year = "1927",
    journal = "Journal of the Linnaean Society of London, v. 36, p. 457-466",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Huxley, J., 1927, On the relation between egg-weight and body-weight in birds: Journal of the Linnaean Society of London, v. 36, p. 457-466.}"
}

@article{doi101615critrevbiomedengv24i2320,
    author = "Bardou, A. and Auger, Pierre and Birkui, P and Chassé, Jean-Luc",
    title = "Modeling of Cardiac Electrophysiological Mechanisms: From Action Potential Genesis to its Propagation in Myocardium",
    year = "1996",
    journal = "Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering",
    abstract = "The aim of the present paper is to describe the different attempts at modeling cardiac electrophysiological mechanisms, mainly at the membrane and cellular level, from action potential genesis to its propagation in myocardium. The Hodgkin and Huxley model describing the nervous action potential's theoretical reconstruction is first recalled, for it represents the basic model for a large part of cardiac action potential models. These models (Beeler and Reuter, Van Capelle and Durrer, Luo and Rudy) are then successively studied as their main applications by diverse authors. Varied approaches, like the Fitzhugh-Nagumo model (derived from the Bonhoeffer-Van der Pol model of oscillatory systems) or cellular automata models applied to the study of ventricular activation wave propagation and diseases associated with its perturbation, are then presented and discussed. Other, different approaches, such as general studies of excitable media, are evoked. This paper concludes with a critical evaluation of these different methods of electrophysiological cardiac modeling and of the main domains in which they led to significant results and in which they appear able to generate future perspectives.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v24.i2-3.20",
    doi = "10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v24.i2-3.20",
    openalex = "W2064605612"
}

@book{doi101093oxfordhb97801992045400030028,
    author = "Brooke, John Hedley",
    title = "Samuel Wilberforce, Thomas Huxley, and Genesis",
    year = "2011",
    booktitle = "Oxford University Press eBooks",
    abstract = "Both the bishop of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce, and Thomas Huxley, one of Darwin's staunch defenders, wrote long reviews of Darwin's Origin of Species that accurately reveal their differences. In Wilberforce's extensive review, the majority of space was devoted to what he regarded as the scientific and philosophical shortcomings of Darwin's theory. A striking feature of Wilberforce's review was its calculated avoidance of theological opprobrium. He left no doubt that he saw incompatibility between the new science and a Christian anthropology, but only in the closing pages of his critique did he dwell on theological issues. Huxley saw in Darwinian theory the beginning of a new epoch in which the cultural issues raised were of such magnitude that, with prophetic accuracy, he judged them unlikely to be resolved in his generation.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199204540.003.0028",
    doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199204540.003.0028",
    openalex = "W2734573898"
}