New zealand

@techreport{oliver1949the3,
    author = "Oliver, W. R. B",
    title = "The Moas of New Zealand and Australia",
    year = "1949",
    howpublished = "Bulletin of the Dominion Museum, v. 15",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Oliver, W. R. B., 1949, The Moas of New Zealand and Australia: Bulletin of the Dominion Museum, v. 15.}"
}

@article{lebour1955ivfirststage,
    author = "Lebour, Marie V.",
    title = "IV.—First-stage larvæ hatched from New Zealand decapod crustacea",
    year = "1955",
    journal = "Annals and Magazine of Natural History",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1080/00222935508651822",
    doi = "10.1080/00222935508651822",
    number = "85",
    pages = "43-48",
    volume = "8"
}

@techreport{glaessner1960the1,
    author = "Glaessner, M. F",
    title = "The fossil decapod Crustacea of New Zealand and the evolution of the order Decapoda",
    year = "1960",
    howpublished = "New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, v. 31, p. 1-63",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Glaessner, M. F., 1960, The fossil decapod Crustacea of New Zealand and the evolution of the order Decapoda: New Zealand Geological Survey, Paleontological Bulletin, v. 31, p. 1-63.}"
}

@article{crossref1965australiannew,
    title = "Australian/New Zealand Meeting On Decapod Crustacea",
    year = "1965",
    journal = "Crustaceana",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1163/156854065x00118",
    doi = "10.1163/156854065x00118",
    number = "3",
    pages = "320",
    volume = "9"
}

@article{crossref1966a,
    title = "A new species of Paromola (Crustacea, Decapoda, Thelxiopidae) from New Zealand",
    year = "1966",
    journal = "Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(66)90639-5",
    doi = "10.1016/0011-7471(66)90639-5",
    number = "4",
    pages = "775",
    volume = "13"
}

@article{mcgowen1986the2,
    author = "McGowen, C",
    title = "The wing musculature of the Weka (Gallirallus australis), a flightless rail endemic to New Zealand",
    year = "1986",
    journal = "Journal of Zoology, v. 210, p. 305-346",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {McGowen, C., 1986, The wing musculature of the Weka (Gallirallus australis), a flightless rail endemic to New Zealand: Journal of Zoology, v. 210, p. 305-346.}"
}

Eight species of brachyuran decapod crustaceans are recorded from coastal outcrops of Island Sandstone between Perpendicular Point and Punakaiki, Westland, New Zealand. The fauna consists of three raninids— Laeviranina pororariensis (Glaessner), L. keyesi n. sp., Lyreidus bennetti n. sp.; two portunids— Rhachiosoma granuliferum (Glaessner), Pororaria eocenica Glaessner; a goneplacid— Carcinoplax temikoensis n. sp.; and two majids— Leptomithrax griffini n. sp., Notomithrax allani n. sp. Together, they form the most diverse brachyuran assemblage yet described from New Zealand. The decapods are preserved in unusual elliptical masses, with their long axes typically parallel to bedding, containing superbly preserved cuticle often surrounded by well-formed fecal pellets, probably of decapod origin. The accumulations are interpreted to be mechanical concentrations within depressions produced by decapods or associated spatangoid echinoids. Although seven of the species have been recorded only from the Island Sandstone, Rhachiosoma granuliferum (Glaessner) is now known to occur in the correlative deep-water facies of the Kaiata Formation in North Westland, as well as in the Tapui Sandstone, North Otago (middle Eocene), and from coeval rocks at Snowdrift Quarry, southeast Otago. The raninids suggest comparison with congeneric forms from Snowdrift Quarry and the Tapui Sandstone, as well as with the La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctica. Based upon associated foraminiferans, a Kaiatan–Runangan (late Eocene) age is assigned to this fauna. The occurrences of Carcinoplax, Leptomithrax, and Notomithrax represent paleobiogeographic and stratigraphic records for the genera.

@article{feldmann1990late,
    author = "Feldmann, Rodney M. and Maxwell, Phillip A.",
    title = "Late Eocene Decapod Crustacea from North Westland, South Island, New Zealand",
    year = "1990",
    journal = "Journal of Paleontology",
    abstract = "Eight species of brachyuran decapod crustaceans are recorded from coastal outcrops of Island Sandstone between Perpendicular Point and Punakaiki, Westland, New Zealand. The fauna consists of three raninids— Laeviranina pororariensis (Glaessner), L. keyesi n. sp., Lyreidus bennetti n. sp.; two portunids— Rhachiosoma granuliferum (Glaessner), Pororaria eocenica Glaessner; a goneplacid— Carcinoplax temikoensis n. sp.; and two majids— Leptomithrax griffini n. sp., Notomithrax allani n. sp. Together, they form the most diverse brachyuran assemblage yet described from New Zealand. The decapods are preserved in unusual elliptical masses, with their long axes typically parallel to bedding, containing superbly preserved cuticle often surrounded by well-formed fecal pellets, probably of decapod origin. The accumulations are interpreted to be mechanical concentrations within depressions produced by decapods or associated spatangoid echinoids. Although seven of the species have been recorded only from the Island Sandstone, Rhachiosoma granuliferum (Glaessner) is now known to occur in the correlative deep-water facies of the Kaiata Formation in North Westland, as well as in the Tapui Sandstone, North Otago (middle Eocene), and from coeval rocks at Snowdrift Quarry, southeast Otago. The raninids suggest comparison with congeneric forms from Snowdrift Quarry and the Tapui Sandstone, as well as with the La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctica. Based upon associated foraminiferans, a Kaiatan–Runangan (late Eocene) age is assigned to this fauna. The occurrences of Carcinoplax, Leptomithrax, and Notomithrax represent paleobiogeographic and stratigraphic records for the genera.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000018989",
    doi = "10.1017/s0022336000018989",
    number = "5",
    pages = "779-797",
    volume = "64"
}

@article{manning1993two,
    author = "Manning, Raymond B.",
    title = "Two new dorippid crabs from Australia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Dorippidae)",
    year = "1993",
    journal = "Records of the Australian Museum",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.45.1993.124",
    doi = "10.3853/j.0067-1975.45.1993.124",
    number = "1",
    pages = "1-4",
    volume = "45"
}

This book is a comprehensive guide to the identification of 800 species of decapod and stomatopod crustaceans from southern Australian marine waters. It is liberally illustrated with more than 1000 line drawings giving good views of many species as well as diagnostic illustrations. Details for each species include the authority, year of description, sometimes a common name, diagnosis, size, geographical distribution, and ecological and depth distribution. The chapter on the Stomatopoda is by Shane Ahyong. Sections within each chapter are hierarchical, species within genera, within families (often with subfamilies as well). Identification is achieved through the use of dichotomous keys adapted from many originally published in the primary literature, or developed from scratch. Some keys are to all Australian taxa but most are to southern Australian taxa only. The information in this book derives from over 200 years of collecting in southern Australian environments, from the intertidal to the deep sea, and publications in numerous journals in several languages. More than 800 of these papers and books are cited. Winner of the 2005 Whitley Award for Systematics.

@misc{crossref2004marine,
    title = "Marine Decapod Crustacea of Southern Australia",
    year = "2004",
    abstract = "This book is a comprehensive guide to the identification of 800 species of decapod and stomatopod crustaceans from southern Australian marine waters. It is liberally illustrated with more than 1000 line drawings giving good views of many species as well as diagnostic illustrations. Details for each species include the authority, year of description, sometimes a common name, diagnosis, size, geographical distribution, and ecological and depth distribution. The chapter on the Stomatopoda is by Shane Ahyong. Sections within each chapter are hierarchical, species within genera, within families (often with subfamilies as well). Identification is achieved through the use of dichotomous keys adapted from many originally published in the primary literature, or developed from scratch. Some keys are to all Australian taxa but most are to southern Australian taxa only. The information in this book derives from over 200 years of collecting in southern Australian environments, from the intertidal to the deep sea, and publications in numerous journals in several languages. More than 800 of these papers and books are cited. Winner of the 2005 Whitley Award for Systematics.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643092129",
    doi = "10.1071/9780643092129"
}

The crustacean decapod fauna of Cubagua Island in the Caribbean Sea, Venezuela, an island much affected by coastal upweling, was surveyed. A total of 178 species from 41 families were recorded, of which 56 species were new records for the island; eigth genera and six species were new records for Venezuela. Most species had previously been recorded from the the Caribbean province, 19.7% were endemic for the province, 64.1% had affinities to the Brazilian province, 57.3% to the Texan and Carolinian provinces and 45.5% showed continuous distributions across the provinces but showing less endemism and more affinities with Brazilian province than the general trends of distributions of decapods in the Caribbean. It appears that upwelling processes around the island hinders the development of the typical Caribbean marine ecosystems. The proximity with the northern limit of the Brazilian province also affects the biodiversity of the island.

@article{hernándezávila2007benthic,
    author = "HERNÁNDEZ-ÁVILA, IVÁN and GÓMEZ, ALFREDO and LIRA, CARLOS and GALINDO, LEE",
    title = "Benthic decapod crustaceans (Crustacea: Decapoda) of Cubagua Island, Venezuela",
    year = "2007",
    journal = "Zootaxa",
    abstract = "The crustacean decapod fauna of Cubagua Island in the Caribbean Sea, Venezuela, an island much affected by coastal upweling, was surveyed. A total of 178 species from 41 families were recorded, of which 56 species were new records for the island; eigth genera and six species were new records for Venezuela. Most species had previously been recorded from the the Caribbean province, 19.7\% were endemic for the province, 64.1\% had affinities to the Brazilian province, 57.3\% to the Texan and Carolinian provinces and 45.5\% showed continuous distributions across the provinces but showing less endemism and more affinities with Brazilian province than the general trends of distributions of decapods in the Caribbean. It appears that upwelling processes around the island hinders the development of the typical Caribbean marine ecosystems. The proximity with the northern limit of the Brazilian province also affects the biodiversity of the island.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1557.1.2",
    doi = "10.11646/zootaxa.1557.1.2",
    number = "1",
    volume = "1557"
}

New Zealand Decapoda The decapod crustaceans collected during the Passage de Vénus sur le Soleil expedition to New Zealand were examined and treated in Filhol (1884c; 1885b–j). The accurate dates of these publications (viz., Filhol 1884c; 1885b–j) have not hitherto been accurately determined (see Forest et al. 2000: 10, 11). Notices of publication (A. Milne-Edwards 1885; Anonymous 1884, 1885; Carus 1884, 1885a, b) and date-stamps on copies of Filhol’s publications at the Natural History Museum (London), have allowed the relative priority of Filhol’s (1884c; 1885b–j) publications on New Zealand decapods to be determined. Preliminary descriptions of several taxa were published in a series of short papers in the Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris (Filhol 1884c, 1885b–h). These same names were stated as new in a more detailed account that was published in the Bibliothèque de l’École des hautes Études (Filhol 1885i). These names were again described in detail as new in the official scientific results of the Passage de Vénus sur le Soleil expedition (Filhol 1885j) (Fig. 1 B). These publications made no reference to the earlier preliminary descriptions. This has led to many workers overlooking the earlier preliminary descriptions (e.g. Chilton & Bennett 1929; Griffin 1963). Lobophrys, an incorrect subsequent spelling of Labophrys Filhol, 1885 (Majidae Samouelle, 1819), a junior objective synonym of Paramithrax H. Milne Edwards, 1834 The genus-group name Labophrys was first published in Filhol (1885b: 27), who stated that the name was used by H. Milne Edwards on labels in the collections of the “Muséum de Paris” (i.e. Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris). This attribution was repeated in subsequent publications by the same author (i.e. Filhol 1885i: 7; 1885j: 361). The name was subsequently spelt as Lobophrys in Filhol (1885i: 7; 1885j: 361) and this spelling has been used by all subsequent authors (e.g. Davie 2002: 307; Griffin 1963: 233; Ng et al. 2008: 117). Pisa barbicornis Latreille, in Latreille, Le Peletier, Serville & Guérin, 1825, is the type species by monotypy (Article 68.3 of the Code, ICZN 1999). Low & Ng (2012: 49) have argued that the authorship of the taxa conventionally attributed to “Latreille, 1825” (including Pisa barbicornis) should be attributed to Latreille, in Latreille, Le Peletier, Serville & Guérin, 1825 instead. The spelling Labophrys was used three times, and exclusively, in Filhol (1885b: 27) and there is an absence “in the original publication itself [of] clear evidence of an inadvertent error” (Article 32.5.1 of the Code, ICZN 1999). Furthermore, Article 33.3.1 of the Code (ICZN 1999) which states that “when an incorrect subsequent spelling is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the publication of the original spelling, the subsequent spelling and attribution are to be preserved and the spelling is deemed to be a correct original spelling” does not apply because Filhol (1885b: 27) has never been cited as the first usage of the name Lobophrys. The name Labophrys Filhol, 1885, is therefore regarded as the correct spelling, and Lobophrys (which was first used in Filhol 1885i: 7), is an incorrect subsequent spelling. Labophrys Filhol, 1885, is an junior objective synonym of Paramithrax H. Milne Edwards, 1834, as they have the same type species (see Davie 2002: 307; Griffin 1963: 233; Ng et al. 2008: 117). edwardsi, 1885h: 48 Porcellanopagurus edwardsi Filhol, 1885 McLaughlin et al. (2010: 34); Porcellanopagurus [Paguridae] Saint Laurent & McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 110–114) edwardsii, Eupagurus c 1884c: 66 Diacanthurus spinulimanus (Miers, 1876) McLaughlin et al. (2010: 29) [Paguridae] edwardsii, Hymenicus d 1885d: 43 Halicarcinus varius (Dana, 1851) Ng et al. (2008: 108) [Hymenosomatidae]b Eurymolambrus [sic] 1885j: 371 Eurynolambrus H. Milne Edwards & — Lucas, 1841 [Majidae] ferox, Lithodes 1885a: 55 Lithodes ferox Filhol, 1885 [Lithodidae] McLaughlin et al. (2010: 12) gracilipes, Nematocarcinus 1884a: 232 Nematocarcinus gracilipes Filhol, 1884 De Grave & Fransen (2011: [Nematocarcinidae] 299); Holthuis (1980: 189) ......continued on the next page ......continued on the next page rubroguttata, Pasiphae 1885k: pl. 5,? Deosergestes corniculum (Krøyer, 1855) De Grave & Fransen (2011: caption [Sergestidae] 241); Holthuis (1980: 192) Rupellioides [sic] 1885i: 50 Ruppellioides A. Milne-Edwards, 1867 Ng et al. (2008: 64) [Menippidae] setosus, Pagurus 1885i: 34 Areopaguristes setosus (H. Milne McLaughlin et al. (2010: 18) Edwards, 1848) [Diogenidae] spinosus, Pilumnus 1885c: 28, 29 Pilumnus spinosus Filhol, 1885 Ng et al. (2008: 142) [Pilumnidae] stewarti, Eupagurus 1884c: 67 Lophopagurus (Australeremus) stewarti McLaughlin et al. (2010: 30); (Filhol, 1884) [Paguridae] Saint Laurent & McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 179–181) stewarti, Eurynolambrus — See Eurynolambrus australis var. stewarti — stewarti, Petrolisthes 1885g: 47 Petrolisthes novaezelandiae Filhol, 1885 Osawa & McLaughlin (2010: [Porcellanidae] 114) talismanii, Galacantha 1885k: pl. 3, Galacantha rostrata A. Milne Edwards, Baba et al. (2008: 62) caption 1880 [Galatheidae] thompsoni, Eupagurus 1885i: 33 Lophopagurus (Lophopagurus) thompsoni McLaughlin et al. (2010: 30) (Filhol, 1885) [Paguridae] traversi, Eupagurus 1885i: 32 Pagurus traversi (Filhol, 1885) McLaughlin et al. (2010: 34); [Paguridae] Saint Laurent & McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 206–209) a Spelt as “ Hymenicus cooki ” in Filhol (1885i: 18; 1885j: 401). b Ng et al. (2008: 109) discussed that Melrose’s (1975) identification of some of hymenosomatid species names of Filhol is doubtful, and that the type material will need to be re-examined to confirm these identities. c Spelt as “ Eupagurus edwardsi ” in Filhol (1885i: 25; 1885j: 412). d Spelt as “ Hymenicus edwardsi ” in Filhol (1885i: 17). e Crane (1975: 323) mentioned that the type (s) of this species could not be located in the Muséum d’Histoire naturelle (Paris) or “elsewhere”. Dell (in Crane 1975: 323) is quoted as discussing that any species of the genus Uca is unlikely to be found at Campbell Island, “where the crab fauna is particularly sparse and is obviously Subantarctic in derivation and relationship”. This opinion is shared by Colin McLay (in litt., 15 February 2013). Crane (1975: 323) also noted that “Filhol’s description is insufficient for determining the specimen’s affinities, and he published no illustration”. Crane (1975: 323) appears to have overlooked the figures of Gelassimus [sic] huttoni that were published in Filhol (1885j: pl. 45, figs. 1–4, 8–12; reproduced as Fig. 1 A). Herein, we follow the opinion of Ng et al. (2008: 242), who tentatively regarded this species as a valid name of uncertain taxonomic placement (i.e. “ incerta sedis ”). f It is clear that this species was named after the New Zealand naturalist Thomas William Kirk, as another species in the same publication was named after another New Zealand naturalist, James Hector. As discussed by Saint Laurent & McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 176) and following the provisions of Article 32.5.1 (ICZN 1999: 39), the incorrect original spelling “ krikii ” must be emended to kirkii. g See the discussion in the text. h The name Megametope was first used by Filhol (1885i: 49) in a checklist of New Zealand Crustacea as follows: “ Megametope rotundifrons, A. M.-Edw.”. Although without a description, the name is available (Article 12.2.5 of the Code, ICZN 1999). The first description of this genus-group name is conventionally cited as Filhol (1885j: 373) (e.g. Davie 2002: 552; McNeill 1926: 129). i First published as a nomen nudum in Filhol (1885i: 51). j Chilton & Bennett (1929: 751) considered Panopeus otagoensis Filhol, 1885 to be a valid species and noted that this species “is known from a single male specimen collected by Hutton at Port Chalmers and described by Filhol. It would thus appear that the species is endemic, and that the type is in the Paris Museum”. Bennett (1964: 14) considered this species to be among those “described or recorded by overseas authors from Australian or other material incorrectly alleged to have been collected in New Zealand ”. In their world checklist of Brachyura, Ng et al. (2008: 194) accepted the validity of this species and assigned it to the family Xanthidae. Colin McLay (in litt., 15 February 2013) advises that the status of this species should be considered to be incerta sedis as “its identity is by no means clear”. Acknowledgements The assistance of Paul F. Clark, Lisa di Maggio and Judith Magee (Natural History Museum, London) during the author’s visit to their institution is gratefully acknowledged. Rafael Lemaitre (U. S. National Museum, Smithsonian Institution) and Peter Castro (California State Polytechnic University, California) helped check copies of Filhol’s publications respectively at the U. S. National Museum and the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Peter Castro and Sammy De Grave (University of Oxford) provided constructive comments on the manuscript. S. K. Tan (National University of Singapore) provided a sounding-board for discussion related to the names Labophrys and Lobophrys. Colin McLay (University of Canterbury, New Zealand) kindly reviewed the submitted manuscript and provided many helpful comments. References Ahyong, S.T. & Ng, P.K.L. (2008) Alain raymondi, a new species of deepwater pinnotherid crab (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) from the Philippines, commensal with holothurians. Zootaxa, 1919, 61 –68. Anonymous (1885) La vie au fond des mers. Les explorations sous-marines et les voyages du Travailleur et du Talisman; par H. Filhol. Paris, G. Masson, 1885; 1 vol. gr. in-8° illustré. (Présenté par M. A. Milne-Edwards.). In: Séance du lundi 16 novembre 1885. Présidence de M. Jurien de la Gravière. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 101(20), 1033. Anonymous (1890) Table générale par noms d’auteurs des articles contenus dans les cinquième, sixième & septième séries des Bulletins. 1836 à 1888. Société Philomathique de Paris, Paris, vi + 55 + [1]. Anonymous (1902) Dr. Henri Filhol. Nature, 66(1701), 133–134. Baba, K., Macpherson, E., Poore, G.C.B., Ahyong, S.T., Bermudez, A., Cabezas, P., Lin, C.-W., Nizinski, M., Rodrigues, C. & Schnabel, K.E. (2008) Catalogue of squat lobsters of the world (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura—families Chirostylidae, Galatheidae and Kiwaidae). Zootaxa, 1905, 1 –220. Bennett, E.W. (1964) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Crustacea Brachyura. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Bulletin, 153, 1 –120. Carus, J.V. (1884) Filhol, H., Note sur espèces nouvelles [5.] d’ Eupagurus recueillies en Nouvelle-Zélande. in: Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris (7.) T. 8. No. 2. p. 66–68. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 7(174) [18 August 1884], 437. Carus, J.V. (1885 a) Filhol, H., Nouvelle description d’une espèces de Crustacé appartenant au genre Elamene [E. longirostris n.]. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 45.; Filhol, H., Description d’une nouvelle espèce de Crustacé appartenant au genre Halicarcinus [H. Huttoni]. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 45–46.; Filhol, H., Description de nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Hymenicus, provenant de Nouvelle-Zélande. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 43–44. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 8 (198) [29 June 1885], 362. Carus, J.V. (1885 b) Filhol, H., Observations relatives aux espèces du genre Paramithrax vivant en Nouvelle-Zélande. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 26–27.; Filhol, H., Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Petrolisthes. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 46–47.; Filhol, H., Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Pilumnus. ibid. p. 28–29; Filhol, H., Description d’au nouveau genre de Crustacée provenant de la Nouvelle-Zélande (Porcellanopagurus Edwardsi). in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 47–48. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 8 (198) [29 June 1885], 363. Castro, P. (2007) A reappraisal of the family Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) and revision of the subfamily Goneplacinae, with the description of 10 new genera and 18 new species. Zoosystema, 29 (4), 609–773. Chilton, C. & Bennett, E.W. (1929) Contributions for a revision of the Crustacea Brachyura of New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 59 (4), 731–778. Crosnier, A. (1978) Crustacés Décapodes Pénéides Aristeidae (Benthesicyminae, Aristaeinae, Solenocerinae). Faune de Madagascar, 46, 1–197. Crosnier, A. & Forest, J. (1973) Les crevettes profondes de l’Atlantique oriental tropical. Faune tropicale, 19, 1-409. Davie, P.J.F. (2002) Crustacea: Malacostraca: Eucarida (Part 2): Decapoda – Anomura, Brachyura. In: Wells, A. & Houston, W.W.K. (Eds), Zoological Catalogues of Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, vol. 19.3B, i–xi, 1–641. De Grave, S. & Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2011) Carideorum catalogus: the Recent species of the dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, procarididean and caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden, 85 (9), 195–589. Evenhuis, N.L. (2003) Dating and publication of the Encyclopédie Méthodique (1782–1832), with special reference to the parts of the Histoire naturelle and details on the Histoire naturelle des Insectes. Zootaxa, 166, 1 –48. Filhol, H. (1884 a) Explorations sous-marines. Voyage du «Talisman». La Nature, Revue des Sciences et de leurs Applications aux Arts et à l’Industrie, Journal hebdomadaire illustré. A. Lahure, Paris, vol. 12 (1), 119–122, 134–138, 147–151, 161–164, 182–186, 198–202, 230–234, 278–282, 326–330, 391 –394. [Issued in parts, between 19 January and 17 May 1885, see Table 1; pages 230–234 translated as Filhol (1884b)] Filhol, H. (1884 b) The deep-sea Crustacea dredged by the Talisman. Science, 3 (71), 713–716. [Published 13 June 1884; translation of Filhol (1884a: 230–234)]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-3.71.713 Filhol, H. (1884 c) Note sur quelques espèces nouvelles d’ Eupagurus recueillies en Nouvelle-Zélande. In: Séance du 22 décembre 1883. Présidence de M. Sauvage. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 8, 66–68. [Published before 18 August 1884, see Carus (1884: 437)] Filhol, H. (1885 a) La vie au fond des mers. La Nature, Revue des Sciences et de leurs Applications aux Arts et à l’Industrie, Journal hebdomadaire illustré. A. Lahure, Paris, vol. 13(1): 355–358, 411–414; vol. 13 (2), 55–58, 132–134, 227–230, 283–286, 379–382, 407–410. [Issued in parts between 9 May and 28 November 1885, see Table 1] Filhol, H. (1885 b) Observations relatives aux espèces du genre Paramithrax vivant en Nouvelle-Zélande. In: Séance du 13 décembre 1884. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 26–27. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 c) Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Pilumnus. In: Séance du 13 décembre 1884. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 28–29. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 d) Description de nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Hymenicus, provenant de Nouvelle- Zélande. In: Séance du 17 décembre 1884. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 43–44. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885a: 362)] Filhol, H. (1885 e) Nouvelle description d’une espèce Crustacé appartenant au genre Elamene provenant de l’île Stewart (Nouvelle-Zélande). In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 45. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885a: 362)] Filhol, H. (1885 f) Description d’une nouvelle espèce de Crustacé appartenant au genre Halicarcinus. In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 45–46. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885a: 362)] Filhol, H. (1885 g) Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Pétrolisthes. In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 46–47. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 h) Description d’un nouveau genre de Crustacé provenant de la Nouvelle-Zélande. In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 47–48. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 i) Considérations relatives à la faune des crustacés de la Nouvelle-Zélande. Bibliothèque de l’École des hautes Études, Section des Sciences naturelles, 30 (2), 1–60. [Natural History Museum (London) copy date-stamped 22 September 1885] Filhol, H. (1885 j) Crustacés. In: Mission de l’Île Campbell. Recherches zoologiques, botaniques et gėologiques faites ã l’Île Campbell et Nouvelle Ƶėlande. Recueil de Mémoires, Rapports et Documents relatifs à l’Observation du Passage de Vénus sur le Soleil. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, vol. 3(2) (Text), 349–510; vol. 3(2) (Atlas), pls. 38–55. [Published before 2 November 1885, see A. Milne-Edwards (1885: 855)] Filhol, H. (1885 k) La vie au fond des mers. Les explorations sous-marines et les voyages du Travailleur et du Talisman. G. Masson, Paris, viii + 303 pp., pls. 1–8. [Published before 16 November 1885, see Anonymous (1885: 1033)] Forest, J., Saint Laurent, M. de, McLaughlin, P.A. & Lemaitre, R. (2000) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Paguridea (Decapoda: Anomura) exclusive of the Lithodidae. NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 114, 1–250. Gaudry, A. (1902) Henri Filhol. La Nature, Revue des Sciences et de leurs Applications aux Arts et à l’Industrie, Journal hebdomadaire illustré. A. Lahure, Paris, vol. 30 (1), 367–368, 1 portrait. Griffin, D.J.G. (1963) Notomithrax gen. nov. and the status of the genus Paramithrax H. Milne Edwards (Crustacea, Brachyura, Majidae). Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 3 (22), 229–237. Holthuis, L.B. (1980) The identity of Hapalopoda investigator Filhol, 1885 (Decapoda, Penaeidae) and other shrimps collected by the 1880–1883 “TravaiIleur” and “Talisman” expeditions. Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden, 55 (15), 183–194. ICZN, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xxix + 306 pp. Latreille, P.A. (1825–1828) Pise, Pisa. pp. 139–143. In: Latreille, P.A., Le Peletier, A.-L.-M., Serville, J.-G.-A. & Guérin, F.-E., Encyclopédie Méthodique. Histoire Naturelle. Entomologie, ou Histoire naturelle des Crustacés, des Arachnides et des Insectes. Agasse, Paris, vol. 10(1–2), [6] + 832 pp. [Published in two parts (for dates of publication see Evenhuis 2003: 36): pp. 1–344 (1 October 1825); pp. 345–832 (13 December 1828)] Lemaitre, R. (2000) Superfamily Paguroidea. Family Parapaguridae. Pp. 210–231. In: Forest, J., Saint Laurent, M. de, McLaughlin, P.A. & Lemaitre, R., The marine fauna of New Zealand: Paguridea (Decapoda: Anomura) exclusive of the Lithodidae. NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 114, 1–250. Lenz, H. (1901) Crustaceen. In: Ergebnisse einer Reise nach dem Pacific (Schauinsland 1896–1897). Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere, 14 (5), 429–482, pl. 32. Low, M.E.Y. & Ng, P.K.L. (2012) The Brachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda) described by Sidney Irving Smith: checklist, dates of publication and bibliography, with a discussion on Xantho stimpsoni A. Milne-Edwards, 1879, and X. stimpsonii Smith, 1869. Zootaxa, 3359, 43 –54. Manning, R.B. & Holthuis, L.B. (1981) West African brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 306: i–xii, 1–379. McLaughlin, P.A., Komai, T., Lemaitre, R. & Rahayu, D.L. (2010) Annotated checklist of anomuran decapod crustaceans of the world (exclusive of the Kiwaoidea and families Chirostylidae and Galatheidae of the Galatheoidea) Part I – Lithodoidea, Lomisoidea and Paguroidea. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supp. 23, 5–107. Melrose, M.J. (1975) The marine fauna of New Zealand: family Hymenosomatidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, 34, 1–123, pls. 1, 2. Milne-Edwards, A. (1885) L’histoire naturelle de l’île Campbell et de la Nouvelle-Zélande. p. 855–856. In: Séance du lundi 2 novembre 1885. Présidence de M. Bouley. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 101(18), 849–904. Milne Edwards, H. (1834) Histoire naturelle des Crustacés, comprenant l’anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux. Tome premier. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, xxxv + 468 pp. Ng, P.K.L., Guinot, D. & Davie, P.J.F. (2008) Systema brachyurorum: part I. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supp. 17, 1–286. Osawa, M. & McLaughlin, P.A. (2010) Annotated checklist of anomuran decapod crustaceans of the world (exclusive of the Kiwaoidea and families Chirostylidae and Galatheidae of the Galatheoidea) Part II – Porcellanidae. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supp. 23, 109–129. Pettit, A. (1902) Le professeur Henri Filhol, 11 mai 1843–28 avril 1902. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire naturelle d’Autun, 15, 415–453, 1 portrait. Saint Laurent, M.A. & McLaughlin, P.A. (2000) Superfamily Paguroidea. Family Paguridae. Pp. 104–210. In: Forest, J., Saint Laurent, M. de, McLaughlin, P.A. & Lemaitre, R., The marine fauna of New Zealand: Paguridea (Decapoda: Anomura) exclusive of the Lithodidae. NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 114, 1–250. Samouelle, G. (1819) The Entomologist’s Useful Compendium, or an Introduction to the Knowledge of the British Insects, Comprising the Best Means of Obtaining and Preserving Them, and a Description of the Apparatus Generally Used; Together with the Genera of Linné, and the Modern Method of Arranging the Classes Crustacea, Myriapoda, Spiders, Mites and Insects, From Their Affinities and Structure, According to the Views of Dr. Leach. Also an Explanation of the Terms used in Entomology; a Calendar of the Times of Appearance and Usual Situations of 3,000 Species of British Insects; with Instructions for Collecting and Fitting up Objects for the Microscope. Thomas Boys, London, [5] + 6–496 pp., pls. 1–12.

@misc{low2013decapoda,
    author = "Low, Martyn E. Y.",
    title = "Decapoda",
    year = "2013",
    publisher = "Zenodo",
    abstract = "New Zealand Decapoda The decapod crustaceans collected during the Passage de Vénus sur le Soleil expedition to New Zealand were examined and treated in Filhol (1884c; 1885b–j). The accurate dates of these publications (viz., Filhol 1884c; 1885b–j) have not hitherto been accurately determined (see Forest et al. 2000: 10, 11). Notices of publication (A. Milne-Edwards 1885; Anonymous 1884, 1885; Carus 1884, 1885a, b) and date-stamps on copies of Filhol’s publications at the Natural History Museum (London), have allowed the relative priority of Filhol’s (1884c; 1885b–j) publications on New Zealand decapods to be determined. Preliminary descriptions of several taxa were published in a series of short papers in the Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris (Filhol 1884c, 1885b–h). These same names were stated as new in a more detailed account that was published in the Bibliothèque de l’École des hautes Études (Filhol 1885i). These names were again described in detail as new in the official scientific results of the Passage de Vénus sur le Soleil expedition (Filhol 1885j) (Fig. 1 B). These publications made no reference to the earlier preliminary descriptions. This has led to many workers overlooking the earlier preliminary descriptions (e.g. Chilton \& Bennett 1929; Griffin 1963). Lobophrys, an incorrect subsequent spelling of Labophrys Filhol, 1885 (Majidae Samouelle, 1819), a junior objective synonym of Paramithrax H. Milne Edwards, 1834 The genus-group name Labophrys was first published in Filhol (1885b: 27), who stated that the name was used by H. Milne Edwards on labels in the collections of the “Muséum de Paris” (i.e. Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris). This attribution was repeated in subsequent publications by the same author (i.e. Filhol 1885i: 7; 1885j: 361). The name was subsequently spelt as Lobophrys in Filhol (1885i: 7; 1885j: 361) and this spelling has been used by all subsequent authors (e.g. Davie 2002: 307; Griffin 1963: 233; Ng et al. 2008: 117). Pisa barbicornis Latreille, in Latreille, Le Peletier, Serville \& Guérin, 1825, is the type species by monotypy (Article 68.3 of the Code, ICZN 1999). Low \& Ng (2012: 49) have argued that the authorship of the taxa conventionally attributed to “Latreille, 1825” (including Pisa barbicornis) should be attributed to Latreille, in Latreille, Le Peletier, Serville \& Guérin, 1825 instead. The spelling Labophrys was used three times, and exclusively, in Filhol (1885b: 27) and there is an absence “in the original publication itself [of] clear evidence of an inadvertent error” (Article 32.5.1 of the Code, ICZN 1999). Furthermore, Article 33.3.1 of the Code (ICZN 1999) which states that “when an incorrect subsequent spelling is in prevailing usage and is attributed to the publication of the original spelling, the subsequent spelling and attribution are to be preserved and the spelling is deemed to be a correct original spelling” does not apply because Filhol (1885b: 27) has never been cited as the first usage of the name Lobophrys. The name Labophrys Filhol, 1885, is therefore regarded as the correct spelling, and Lobophrys (which was first used in Filhol 1885i: 7), is an incorrect subsequent spelling. Labophrys Filhol, 1885, is an junior objective synonym of Paramithrax H. Milne Edwards, 1834, as they have the same type species (see Davie 2002: 307; Griffin 1963: 233; Ng et al. 2008: 117). edwardsi, 1885h: 48 Porcellanopagurus edwardsi Filhol, 1885 McLaughlin et al. (2010: 34); Porcellanopagurus [Paguridae] Saint Laurent \& McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 110–114) edwardsii, Eupagurus c 1884c: 66 Diacanthurus spinulimanus (Miers, 1876) McLaughlin et al. (2010: 29) [Paguridae] edwardsii, Hymenicus d 1885d: 43 Halicarcinus varius (Dana, 1851) Ng et al. (2008: 108) [Hymenosomatidae]b Eurymolambrus [sic] 1885j: 371 Eurynolambrus H. Milne Edwards \& — Lucas, 1841 [Majidae] ferox, Lithodes 1885a: 55 Lithodes ferox Filhol, 1885 [Lithodidae] McLaughlin et al. (2010: 12) gracilipes, Nematocarcinus 1884a: 232 Nematocarcinus gracilipes Filhol, 1884 De Grave \& Fransen (2011: [Nematocarcinidae] 299); Holthuis (1980: 189) ......continued on the next page ......continued on the next page rubroguttata, Pasiphae 1885k: pl. 5,? Deosergestes corniculum (Krøyer, 1855) De Grave \& Fransen (2011: caption [Sergestidae] 241); Holthuis (1980: 192) Rupellioides [sic] 1885i: 50 Ruppellioides A. Milne-Edwards, 1867 Ng et al. (2008: 64) [Menippidae] setosus, Pagurus 1885i: 34 Areopaguristes setosus (H. Milne McLaughlin et al. (2010: 18) Edwards, 1848) [Diogenidae] spinosus, Pilumnus 1885c: 28, 29 Pilumnus spinosus Filhol, 1885 Ng et al. (2008: 142) [Pilumnidae] stewarti, Eupagurus 1884c: 67 Lophopagurus (Australeremus) stewarti McLaughlin et al. (2010: 30); (Filhol, 1884) [Paguridae] Saint Laurent \& McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 179–181) stewarti, Eurynolambrus — See Eurynolambrus australis var. stewarti — stewarti, Petrolisthes 1885g: 47 Petrolisthes novaezelandiae Filhol, 1885 Osawa \& McLaughlin (2010: [Porcellanidae] 114) talismanii, Galacantha 1885k: pl. 3, Galacantha rostrata A. Milne Edwards, Baba et al. (2008: 62) caption 1880 [Galatheidae] thompsoni, Eupagurus 1885i: 33 Lophopagurus (Lophopagurus) thompsoni McLaughlin et al. (2010: 30) (Filhol, 1885) [Paguridae] traversi, Eupagurus 1885i: 32 Pagurus traversi (Filhol, 1885) McLaughlin et al. (2010: 34); [Paguridae] Saint Laurent \& McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 206–209) a Spelt as “ Hymenicus cooki ” in Filhol (1885i: 18; 1885j: 401). b Ng et al. (2008: 109) discussed that Melrose’s (1975) identification of some of hymenosomatid species names of Filhol is doubtful, and that the type material will need to be re-examined to confirm these identities. c Spelt as “ Eupagurus edwardsi ” in Filhol (1885i: 25; 1885j: 412). d Spelt as “ Hymenicus edwardsi ” in Filhol (1885i: 17). e Crane (1975: 323) mentioned that the type (s) of this species could not be located in the Muséum d’Histoire naturelle (Paris) or “elsewhere”. Dell (in Crane 1975: 323) is quoted as discussing that any species of the genus Uca is unlikely to be found at Campbell Island, “where the crab fauna is particularly sparse and is obviously Subantarctic in derivation and relationship”. This opinion is shared by Colin McLay (in litt., 15 February 2013). Crane (1975: 323) also noted that “Filhol’s description is insufficient for determining the specimen’s affinities, and he published no illustration”. Crane (1975: 323) appears to have overlooked the figures of Gelassimus [sic] huttoni that were published in Filhol (1885j: pl. 45, figs. 1–4, 8–12; reproduced as Fig. 1 A). Herein, we follow the opinion of Ng et al. (2008: 242), who tentatively regarded this species as a valid name of uncertain taxonomic placement (i.e. “ incerta sedis ”). f It is clear that this species was named after the New Zealand naturalist Thomas William Kirk, as another species in the same publication was named after another New Zealand naturalist, James Hector. As discussed by Saint Laurent \& McLaughlin (in Forest et al. 2000: 176) and following the provisions of Article 32.5.1 (ICZN 1999: 39), the incorrect original spelling “ krikii ” must be emended to kirkii. g See the discussion in the text. h The name Megametope was first used by Filhol (1885i: 49) in a checklist of New Zealand Crustacea as follows: “ Megametope rotundifrons, A. M.-Edw.”. Although without a description, the name is available (Article 12.2.5 of the Code, ICZN 1999). The first description of this genus-group name is conventionally cited as Filhol (1885j: 373) (e.g. Davie 2002: 552; McNeill 1926: 129). i First published as a nomen nudum in Filhol (1885i: 51). j Chilton \& Bennett (1929: 751) considered Panopeus otagoensis Filhol, 1885 to be a valid species and noted that this species “is known from a single male specimen collected by Hutton at Port Chalmers and described by Filhol. It would thus appear that the species is endemic, and that the type is in the Paris Museum”. Bennett (1964: 14) considered this species to be among those “described or recorded by overseas authors from Australian or other material incorrectly alleged to have been collected in New Zealand ”. In their world checklist of Brachyura, Ng et al. (2008: 194) accepted the validity of this species and assigned it to the family Xanthidae. Colin McLay (in litt., 15 February 2013) advises that the status of this species should be considered to be incerta sedis as “its identity is by no means clear”. Acknowledgements The assistance of Paul F. Clark, Lisa di Maggio and Judith Magee (Natural History Museum, London) during the author’s visit to their institution is gratefully acknowledged. Rafael Lemaitre (U. S. National Museum, Smithsonian Institution) and Peter Castro (California State Polytechnic University, California) helped check copies of Filhol’s publications respectively at the U. S. National Museum and the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Peter Castro and Sammy De Grave (University of Oxford) provided constructive comments on the manuscript. S. K. Tan (National University of Singapore) provided a sounding-board for discussion related to the names Labophrys and Lobophrys. Colin McLay (University of Canterbury, New Zealand) kindly reviewed the submitted manuscript and provided many helpful comments. References Ahyong, S.T. \& Ng, P.K.L. (2008) Alain raymondi, a new species of deepwater pinnotherid crab (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) from the Philippines, commensal with holothurians. Zootaxa, 1919, 61 –68. Anonymous (1885) La vie au fond des mers. Les explorations sous-marines et les voyages du Travailleur et du Talisman; par H. Filhol. Paris, G. Masson, 1885; 1 vol. gr. in-8° illustré. (Présenté par M. A. Milne-Edwards.). In: Séance du lundi 16 novembre 1885. Présidence de M. Jurien de la Gravière. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 101(20), 1033. Anonymous (1890) Table générale par noms d’auteurs des articles contenus dans les cinquième, sixième \& septième séries des Bulletins. 1836 à 1888. Société Philomathique de Paris, Paris, vi + 55 + [1]. Anonymous (1902) Dr. Henri Filhol. Nature, 66(1701), 133–134. Baba, K., Macpherson, E., Poore, G.C.B., Ahyong, S.T., Bermudez, A., Cabezas, P., Lin, C.-W., Nizinski, M., Rodrigues, C. \& Schnabel, K.E. (2008) Catalogue of squat lobsters of the world (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura—families Chirostylidae, Galatheidae and Kiwaidae). Zootaxa, 1905, 1 –220. Bennett, E.W. (1964) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Crustacea Brachyura. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Bulletin, 153, 1 –120. Carus, J.V. (1884) Filhol, H., Note sur espèces nouvelles [5.] d’ Eupagurus recueillies en Nouvelle-Zélande. in: Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris (7.) T. 8. No. 2. p. 66–68. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 7(174) [18 August 1884], 437. Carus, J.V. (1885 a) Filhol, H., Nouvelle description d’une espèces de Crustacé appartenant au genre Elamene [E. longirostris n.]. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 45.; Filhol, H., Description d’une nouvelle espèce de Crustacé appartenant au genre Halicarcinus [H. Huttoni]. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 45–46.; Filhol, H., Description de nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Hymenicus, provenant de Nouvelle-Zélande. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 43–44. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 8 (198) [29 June 1885], 362. Carus, J.V. (1885 b) Filhol, H., Observations relatives aux espèces du genre Paramithrax vivant en Nouvelle-Zélande. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 26–27.; Filhol, H., Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Petrolisthes. in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 46–47.; Filhol, H., Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Pilumnus. ibid. p. 28–29; Filhol, H., Description d’au nouveau genre de Crustacée provenant de la Nouvelle-Zélande (Porcellanopagurus Edwardsi). in: Bull. Soc. Philomath. Paris, (7.) T. 9. No. 1. p. 47–48. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 8 (198) [29 June 1885], 363. Castro, P. (2007) A reappraisal of the family Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) and revision of the subfamily Goneplacinae, with the description of 10 new genera and 18 new species. Zoosystema, 29 (4), 609–773. Chilton, C. \& Bennett, E.W. (1929) Contributions for a revision of the Crustacea Brachyura of New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 59 (4), 731–778. Crosnier, A. (1978) Crustacés Décapodes Pénéides Aristeidae (Benthesicyminae, Aristaeinae, Solenocerinae). Faune de Madagascar, 46, 1–197. Crosnier, A. \& Forest, J. (1973) Les crevettes profondes de l’Atlantique oriental tropical. Faune tropicale, 19, 1-409. Davie, P.J.F. (2002) Crustacea: Malacostraca: Eucarida (Part 2): Decapoda – Anomura, Brachyura. In: Wells, A. \& Houston, W.W.K. (Eds), Zoological Catalogues of Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, vol. 19.3B, i–xi, 1–641. De Grave, S. \& Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2011) Carideorum catalogus: the Recent species of the dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, procarididean and caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden, 85 (9), 195–589. Evenhuis, N.L. (2003) Dating and publication of the Encyclopédie Méthodique (1782–1832), with special reference to the parts of the Histoire naturelle and details on the Histoire naturelle des Insectes. Zootaxa, 166, 1 –48. Filhol, H. (1884 a) Explorations sous-marines. Voyage du «Talisman». La Nature, Revue des Sciences et de leurs Applications aux Arts et à l’Industrie, Journal hebdomadaire illustré. A. Lahure, Paris, vol. 12 (1), 119–122, 134–138, 147–151, 161–164, 182–186, 198–202, 230–234, 278–282, 326–330, 391 –394. [Issued in parts, between 19 January and 17 May 1885, see Table 1; pages 230–234 translated as Filhol (1884b)] Filhol, H. (1884 b) The deep-sea Crustacea dredged by the Talisman. Science, 3 (71), 713–716. [Published 13 June 1884; translation of Filhol (1884a: 230–234)]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-3.71.713 Filhol, H. (1884 c) Note sur quelques espèces nouvelles d’ Eupagurus recueillies en Nouvelle-Zélande. In: Séance du 22 décembre 1883. Présidence de M. Sauvage. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 8, 66–68. [Published before 18 August 1884, see Carus (1884: 437)] Filhol, H. (1885 a) La vie au fond des mers. La Nature, Revue des Sciences et de leurs Applications aux Arts et à l’Industrie, Journal hebdomadaire illustré. A. Lahure, Paris, vol. 13(1): 355–358, 411–414; vol. 13 (2), 55–58, 132–134, 227–230, 283–286, 379–382, 407–410. [Issued in parts between 9 May and 28 November 1885, see Table 1] Filhol, H. (1885 b) Observations relatives aux espèces du genre Paramithrax vivant en Nouvelle-Zélande. In: Séance du 13 décembre 1884. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 26–27. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 c) Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Pilumnus. In: Séance du 13 décembre 1884. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 28–29. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 d) Description de nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Hymenicus, provenant de Nouvelle- Zélande. In: Séance du 17 décembre 1884. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 43–44. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885a: 362)] Filhol, H. (1885 e) Nouvelle description d’une espèce Crustacé appartenant au genre Elamene provenant de l’île Stewart (Nouvelle-Zélande). In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 45. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885a: 362)] Filhol, H. (1885 f) Description d’une nouvelle espèce de Crustacé appartenant au genre Halicarcinus. In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 45–46. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885a: 362)] Filhol, H. (1885 g) Description de deux nouvelles espèces de Crustacés appartenant au genre Pétrolisthes. In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 46–47. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 h) Description d’un nouveau genre de Crustacé provenant de la Nouvelle-Zélande. In: Séance du 10 janvier 1885. Présidence de M. Fouret. Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, sér. 7, 9, 47–48. [Published before 29 June 1885, see Carus (1885b: 363)] Filhol, H. (1885 i) Considérations relatives à la faune des crustacés de la Nouvelle-Zélande. Bibliothèque de l’École des hautes Études, Section des Sciences naturelles, 30 (2), 1–60. [Natural History Museum (London) copy date-stamped 22 September 1885] Filhol, H. (1885 j) Crustacés. In: Mission de l’Île Campbell. Recherches zoologiques, botaniques et gėologiques faites ã l’Île Campbell et Nouvelle Ƶėlande. Recueil de Mémoires, Rapports et Documents relatifs à l’Observation du Passage de Vénus sur le Soleil. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, vol. 3(2) (Text), 349–510; vol. 3(2) (Atlas), pls. 38–55. [Published before 2 November 1885, see A. Milne-Edwards (1885: 855)] Filhol, H. (1885 k) La vie au fond des mers. Les explorations sous-marines et les voyages du Travailleur et du Talisman. G. Masson, Paris, viii + 303 pp., pls. 1–8. [Published before 16 November 1885, see Anonymous (1885: 1033)] Forest, J., Saint Laurent, M. de, McLaughlin, P.A. \& Lemaitre, R. (2000) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Paguridea (Decapoda: Anomura) exclusive of the Lithodidae. NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 114, 1–250. Gaudry, A. (1902) Henri Filhol. La Nature, Revue des Sciences et de leurs Applications aux Arts et à l’Industrie, Journal hebdomadaire illustré. A. Lahure, Paris, vol. 30 (1), 367–368, 1 portrait. Griffin, D.J.G. (1963) Notomithrax gen. nov. and the status of the genus Paramithrax H. Milne Edwards (Crustacea, Brachyura, Majidae). Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 3 (22), 229–237. Holthuis, L.B. (1980) The identity of Hapalopoda investigator Filhol, 1885 (Decapoda, Penaeidae) and other shrimps collected by the 1880–1883 “TravaiIleur” and “Talisman” expeditions. Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden, 55 (15), 183–194. ICZN, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xxix + 306 pp. Latreille, P.A. (1825–1828) Pise, Pisa. pp. 139–143. In: Latreille, P.A., Le Peletier, A.-L.-M., Serville, J.-G.-A. \& Guérin, F.-E., Encyclopédie Méthodique. Histoire Naturelle. Entomologie, ou Histoire naturelle des Crustacés, des Arachnides et des Insectes. Agasse, Paris, vol. 10(1–2), [6] + 832 pp. [Published in two parts (for dates of publication see Evenhuis 2003: 36): pp. 1–344 (1 October 1825); pp. 345–832 (13 December 1828)] Lemaitre, R. (2000) Superfamily Paguroidea. Family Parapaguridae. Pp. 210–231. In: Forest, J., Saint Laurent, M. de, McLaughlin, P.A. \& Lemaitre, R., The marine fauna of New Zealand: Paguridea (Decapoda: Anomura) exclusive of the Lithodidae. NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 114, 1–250. Lenz, H. (1901) Crustaceen. In: Ergebnisse einer Reise nach dem Pacific (Schauinsland 1896–1897). Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere, 14 (5), 429–482, pl. 32. Low, M.E.Y. \& Ng, P.K.L. (2012) The Brachyura (Crustacea: Decapoda) described by Sidney Irving Smith: checklist, dates of publication and bibliography, with a discussion on Xantho stimpsoni A. Milne-Edwards, 1879, and X. stimpsonii Smith, 1869. Zootaxa, 3359, 43 –54. Manning, R.B. \& Holthuis, L.B. (1981) West African brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 306: i–xii, 1–379. McLaughlin, P.A., Komai, T., Lemaitre, R. \& Rahayu, D.L. (2010) Annotated checklist of anomuran decapod crustaceans of the world (exclusive of the Kiwaoidea and families Chirostylidae and Galatheidae of the Galatheoidea) Part I – Lithodoidea, Lomisoidea and Paguroidea. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supp. 23, 5–107. Melrose, M.J. (1975) The marine fauna of New Zealand: family Hymenosomatidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, 34, 1–123, pls. 1, 2. Milne-Edwards, A. (1885) L’histoire naturelle de l’île Campbell et de la Nouvelle-Zélande. p. 855–856. In: Séance du lundi 2 novembre 1885. Présidence de M. Bouley. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 101(18), 849–904. Milne Edwards, H. (1834) Histoire naturelle des Crustacés, comprenant l’anatomie, la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux. Tome premier. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, xxxv + 468 pp. Ng, P.K.L., Guinot, D. \& Davie, P.J.F. (2008) Systema brachyurorum: part I. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supp. 17, 1–286. Osawa, M. \& McLaughlin, P.A. (2010) Annotated checklist of anomuran decapod crustaceans of the world (exclusive of the Kiwaoidea and families Chirostylidae and Galatheidae of the Galatheoidea) Part II – Porcellanidae. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supp. 23, 109–129. Pettit, A. (1902) Le professeur Henri Filhol, 11 mai 1843–28 avril 1902. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire naturelle d’Autun, 15, 415–453, 1 portrait. Saint Laurent, M.A. \& McLaughlin, P.A. (2000) Superfamily Paguroidea. Family Paguridae. Pp. 104–210. In: Forest, J., Saint Laurent, M. de, McLaughlin, P.A. \& Lemaitre, R., The marine fauna of New Zealand: Paguridea (Decapoda: Anomura) exclusive of the Lithodidae. NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 114, 1–250. Samouelle, G. (1819) The Entomologist’s Useful Compendium, or an Introduction to the Knowledge of the British Insects, Comprising the Best Means of Obtaining and Preserving Them, and a Description of the Apparatus Generally Used; Together with the Genera of Linné, and the Modern Method of Arranging the Classes Crustacea, Myriapoda, Spiders, Mites and Insects, From Their Affinities and Structure, According to the Views of Dr. Leach. Also an Explanation of the Terms used in Entomology; a Calendar of the Times of Appearance and Usual Situations of 3,000 Species of British Insects; with Instructions for Collecting and Fitting up Objects for the Microscope. Thomas Boys, London, [5] + 6–496 pp., pls. 1–12.",
    url = "https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.5614628",
    doi = "10.5281/zenodo.5614628"
}

A new assessment of the global biodiversity of decapod Crustacea (to 31 December 2022) records 17,229 species in 2,550 genera and 203 families. These figures are derived from a well-curated dataset maintained on the online platform DecaNet, a subsidiary of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS). Distinct phases are recognised in the discovery process (as measured by species descriptions) corresponding to major historical and geopolitical time periods, with the current rate of species descriptions being more than three times higher than in the Victorian age of global exploration. Future trends are briefly explored, and it is recognised that a large number of species remain to be discovered and described.

@article{degrave2023benchmarking,
    author = "De Grave, Sammy and Decock, Wim and Dekeyzer, Stefanie and Davie, Peter J F and Fransen, Charles H J M and Boyko, Christopher B and Poore, Gary C B and Macpherson, Enrique and Ahyong, Shane T and Crandall, Keith A and de Mazancourt, Valentin and Osawa, Masayuki and Chan, Tin-Yam and Ng, Peter K L and Lemaitre, Rafael and van der Meij, Sancia E T and Santos, Sandro",
    title = "Benchmarking global biodiversity of decapod crustaceans (Crustacea: Decapoda)",
    year = "2023",
    journal = "Journal of Crustacean Biology",
    abstract = "A new assessment of the global biodiversity of decapod Crustacea (to 31 December 2022) records 17,229 species in 2,550 genera and 203 families. These figures are derived from a well-curated dataset maintained on the online platform DecaNet, a subsidiary of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS). Distinct phases are recognised in the discovery process (as measured by species descriptions) corresponding to major historical and geopolitical time periods, with the current rate of species descriptions being more than three times higher than in the Victorian age of global exploration. Future trends are briefly explored, and it is recognised that a large number of species remain to be discovered and described.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1093/jcbiol/ruad042",
    doi = "10.1093/jcbiol/ruad042",
    number = "3",
    volume = "43"
}

1. Abbreviated or direct development is described in Pilumnus novaezelandiae Filhol, 1886 and P. lumpinus Bennett, 1964 (Xanthidae, Pilumninae) from New Zealand. Embryonic development is separated into Nauplius, Metanauplius, and embryonic Zoea stages. In P. novaezelandiae, larvae hatch at a Megalopa stage and are retained beneath the pleon of the female crab. The Megalopa larva and first five juvenile crab stages are described. In P. lumpinus emergent larvae are advanced, much-modified, and non-natatory Zoeae which are not retained by the parent. The Zoea and Megalopa larvae of this species are described. Abbreviated development has little phylogenetic significance among Brachyura, and has probably evolved as a response to habitat requirements of adult crabs. 2. A brief account is given of the systematics and distribution of the New Zealand xanthid crabs Heterozius rotundifrons A. Milne Edwards, 1867, Ozius truncatus H. Milne Edwards, 1834, and of Heteropanope (Pilumnopeus) serratifrons (Kinahan, xanthid Brachyura and to the Megalopa larvae of Heterozius rotundifrons and Ozius truncatus. Notes are given on the seasonal breeding cycle of Heterozius rotundifrons, and the pre-Zoea larva, two Zoea larval stages, and the Megalopa larva reared in the laboratory are described. Ozius truncatus possesses a pre-Zoea larva, four Zoea larval stages, and a Megalopa larva. These have been reared and are described. A key is given for the separation of the Zoea larval stages. The pre-Zoea larva and first stage Zoea larva of Heteropanope Pilumnopeus serratifrons are described. There are probably four zoeal stages in the larval development of this species. 3. The characters of Zoea larvae of the family Xanthidae described up of the present time are critically analysed and considered in relation to the status of currently accepted adult genera and species, the generic groupings used by Monod (1956), and the generic composition of the subfamilies proposed by Balss (1957). Xanthid Zoea larvae fall into two natural groups of genera based on larval characters, the most important being the length of the antennal exopod in relation to that of the spinous process. The first group is equivalent to the subfamily Xanthinae as reconstituted by Balss (1957), but there is no larval evidence suggesting that the "Panopean" genera should be separated from the "Xanthian" genera as suggested by Monod (1956). A second natural group is formed by larvae of the subfamily Menippinae as in Balss (1932, 1957), the subfamily Pilumninae of Balss (1957), and the genus Geryon. Larvae of genera in the subfamily Trapeziinae Miers should be removed from the section Hyperolissa and included in this second natural group. Zoea larvae described from the genera Heteropanope and Pilumnopeus form a separate branch of the second group. Zoea larval evidence does not support Monod's (1956) separation of Eriphia from the "Menippian" group of genera. 4. The first stage Zoea larva Hemiplax hirtipes (Jacquinot, 1853) is described, and present knowledge concerning larvae of crabs of the family Ocypodidae is summarized discussed. No diagnostic character is common to all ocypodid Zoea larvae, but affinities are shown with those of the families Hymenosomidae, Pinnotheridae, and Grapsidae. 5. Pre-Zoea and first stage Zoea larvae hatched from the grapsid crabs Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius, 1793), Planes marinus Rathbun, 1915, Hemigrapsus crenulatus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837), H. edwardsi (Hilgendorf, 1882), Cyclograpsus lavauxi H. Milne Edwards, 1853, Helice crassa Dana, 1851, and Plagusia chabrus (Linnaeus, 1764) from New Zealand are described. A key is given for the separation of these larvae. Known Zoea larvae of the family Grapsidae show close affinities with those of the brachyrhynchous families Ocypodidae and Gecarcinidae, and fall into four groups based on larval characters. This system of larval classification agrees with the present arrangement of adult genera into subfamilies except for a division among larvae of the subfamilies Varuninae and Sesarminae. The length of larval life and larval dispersal probably has no bearing on the presence or absence of certain New Zealand species at the Chatham Islands.

@misc{andwearNonelife,
    author = "Wear, Robert George",
    title = "Life - History Studies on New Zealand Brachyura (Crustacea, Decapoda)",
    year = "None",
    abstract = {1. Abbreviated or direct development is described in Pilumnus novaezelandiae Filhol, 1886 and P. lumpinus Bennett, 1964 (Xanthidae, Pilumninae) from New Zealand. Embryonic development is separated into Nauplius, Metanauplius, and embryonic Zoea stages. In P. novaezelandiae, larvae hatch at a Megalopa stage and are retained beneath the pleon of the female crab. The Megalopa larva and first five juvenile crab stages are described. In P. lumpinus emergent larvae are advanced, much-modified, and non-natatory Zoeae which are not retained by the parent. The Zoea and Megalopa larvae of this species are described. Abbreviated development has little phylogenetic significance among Brachyura, and has probably evolved as a response to habitat requirements of adult crabs. 2. A brief account is given of the systematics and distribution of the New Zealand xanthid crabs Heterozius rotundifrons A. Milne Edwards, 1867, Ozius truncatus H. Milne Edwards, 1834, and of Heteropanope (Pilumnopeus) serratifrons (Kinahan, xanthid Brachyura and to the Megalopa larvae of Heterozius rotundifrons and Ozius truncatus. Notes are given on the seasonal breeding cycle of Heterozius rotundifrons, and the pre-Zoea larva, two Zoea larval stages, and the Megalopa larva reared in the laboratory are described. Ozius truncatus possesses a pre-Zoea larva, four Zoea larval stages, and a Megalopa larva. These have been reared and are described. A key is given for the separation of the Zoea larval stages. The pre-Zoea larva and first stage Zoea larva of Heteropanope Pilumnopeus serratifrons are described. There are probably four zoeal stages in the larval development of this species. 3. The characters of Zoea larvae of the family Xanthidae described up of the present time are critically analysed and considered in relation to the status of currently accepted adult genera and species, the generic groupings used by Monod (1956), and the generic composition of the subfamilies proposed by Balss (1957). Xanthid Zoea larvae fall into two natural groups of genera based on larval characters, the most important being the length of the antennal exopod in relation to that of the spinous process. The first group is equivalent to the subfamily Xanthinae as reconstituted by Balss (1957), but there is no larval evidence suggesting that the "Panopean" genera should be separated from the "Xanthian" genera as suggested by Monod (1956). A second natural group is formed by larvae of the subfamily Menippinae as in Balss (1932, 1957), the subfamily Pilumninae of Balss (1957), and the genus Geryon. Larvae of genera in the subfamily Trapeziinae Miers should be removed from the section Hyperolissa and included in this second natural group. Zoea larvae described from the genera Heteropanope and Pilumnopeus form a separate branch of the second group. Zoea larval evidence does not support Monod's (1956) separation of Eriphia from the "Menippian" group of genera. 4. The first stage Zoea larva Hemiplax hirtipes (Jacquinot, 1853) is described, and present knowledge concerning larvae of crabs of the family Ocypodidae is summarized discussed. No diagnostic character is common to all ocypodid Zoea larvae, but affinities are shown with those of the families Hymenosomidae, Pinnotheridae, and Grapsidae. 5. Pre-Zoea and first stage Zoea larvae hatched from the grapsid crabs Leptograpsus variegatus (Fabricius, 1793), Planes marinus Rathbun, 1915, Hemigrapsus crenulatus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837), H. edwardsi (Hilgendorf, 1882), Cyclograpsus lavauxi H. Milne Edwards, 1853, Helice crassa Dana, 1851, and Plagusia chabrus (Linnaeus, 1764) from New Zealand are described. A key is given for the separation of these larvae. Known Zoea larvae of the family Grapsidae show close affinities with those of the brachyrhynchous families Ocypodidae and Gecarcinidae, and fall into four groups based on larval characters. This system of larval classification agrees with the present arrangement of adult genera into subfamilies except for a division among larvae of the subfamilies Varuninae and Sesarminae. The length of larval life and larval dispersal probably has no bearing on the presence or absence of certain New Zealand species at the Chatham Islands.},
    url = "https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.16958914",
    doi = "10.26686/wgtn.16958914"
}