<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The TalkOrigins Archive &#187; TOA PotM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/category/toa-potm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new</link>
	<description>What's New at the TalkOrigins Archive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>September 2008 POTM: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/september-2008-potm-proposal-for-a-theistic-design-detector/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/september-2008-potm-proposal-for-a-theistic-design-detector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rossum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theistic design detector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector 
 Following years of spiritual research by Rossum, Talk.Origins        reveals our official design for a Theistic Design Detector. It is        herewith presented to the Discovery Institute who are doubtless      [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl>
<dt><strong> <a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_09.html">Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector</a></strong> </dt>
<dd> Following years of spiritual research by Rossum, Talk.Origins        reveals our official design for a Theistic Design Detector. It is        herewith presented to the Discovery Institute who are doubtless        anxious to begin construction. </dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/september-2008-potm-proposal-for-a-theistic-design-detector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>August 2008 POTM: Are evolutionists covering up the evidence for sudden creation?</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/august-2008-potm-are-evolutionists-covering-up-the-evidence-for-sudden-creation/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/august-2008-potm-are-evolutionists-covering-up-the-evidence-for-sudden-creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archaeopteryx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cambrian explosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circular argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john harshman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonathan wells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Are evolutionists covering up the evidence for sudden creation? 
 John Harshman answers three arguments by Jonathan Wells which        assert: The sudden appearance of all modern animal groups during        the Cambrian explosion; the use of a circular argument (shared   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl>
<dt><strong><a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_08.html">Are evolutionists covering up the evidence for sudden creation?</a></strong> </dt>
<dd> John Harshman answers three arguments by Jonathan Wells which        assert: The sudden appearance of all modern animal groups during        the Cambrian explosion; the use of a circular argument (shared        characteristics as evidence for common descent) and; that        Archaespteryx isn&#8217;t transitional because evolutionists agree it        is probably not the ancestor of modern birds. </dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/august-2008-potm-are-evolutionists-covering-up-the-evidence-for-sudden-creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July 2008 POTM: Does handed DNA and protein prove Intelligent Design?</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/july-2008-potm-does-handed-dna-and-protein-prove-intelligent-design/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/july-2008-potm-does-handed-dna-and-protein-prove-intelligent-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chirality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary hurd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design creationism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does handed DNA and protein prove Intelligent Design?

 
 &#8220;Dr. Gary Hurd discusses natural (undesigned) forces that may        have lead to the predominance of left handed [L] Amino Acids in        proteins and right handed [D] Nucleic Acids in DNA and RNA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_07.html">Does handed DNA and protein prove Intelligent Design?</a></strong></p>
<dl>
<dt> </dt>
<dd> &#8220;Dr. Gary Hurd discusses natural (undesigned) forces that may        have lead to the predominance of left handed [L] Amino Acids in        proteins and right handed [D] Nucleic Acids in DNA and RNA which        are found in all existing organisms. He also provides examples of        the continuing use of the D form of amino acids revealing clues        to the origin of life.&#8221; </dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/july-2008-potm-does-handed-dna-and-protein-prove-intelligent-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2008 POTM: Testable examples of the emergence and development of novelty from evolution</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/june-2008-potm-testable-examples-of-the-emergence-and-development-of-novelty-from-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/june-2008-potm-testable-examples-of-the-emergence-and-development-of-novelty-from-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthony pagano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steven j]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Testable examples of the emergence and development of novelty from evolution 
 Steven J itemizes cases where random mutation coupled with        natural selection have produced novelty, describes intermediate        forms, and explains the mechanism of natural selection (death    [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl>
<dt><strong> <a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_06.html">Testable examples of the emergence and development of novelty from evolution</a></strong> </dt>
<dd> Steven J itemizes cases where random mutation coupled with        natural selection have produced novelty, describes intermediate        forms, and explains the mechanism of natural selection (death        before reproduction) in response to Tony Pagano&#8217;s assertion that        it is impossible. </dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/june-2008-potm-testable-examples-of-the-emergence-and-development-of-novelty-from-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2008 POTM: What meaning empty rhetoric?</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/may-2008-potm-what-meaning-empty-rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/may-2008-potm-what-meaning-empty-rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antievolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empty rhetoric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noctiluca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 What meaning empty rhetoric?  
 Noctiluca expresses frustration over the empty rhetoric of        an anti-evolutionist who refuses to examine the evidence        from an &#8220;infinitely complex and endlessly interesting&#8221;        universe, much less consider [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl>
<dt><strong> <a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_05.html">What meaning empty rhetoric? </a></strong> </dt>
<dd> Noctiluca expresses frustration over the empty rhetoric of        an anti-evolutionist who refuses to examine the evidence        from an &#8220;infinitely complex and endlessly interesting&#8221;        universe, much less consider the consequences for his beliefs. </dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/may-2008-potm-what-meaning-empty-rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2008 POTM: The Nazi redefinitions of Christianity and Evolution</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/april-2008-potm-the-nazi-redefinitions-of-christianity-and-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/april-2008-potm-the-nazi-redefinitions-of-christianity-and-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard hershey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nazis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 The Nazi redefinitions of Christianity and Evolution  
 Howard Hershey describes how the Nazis redefined and        influenced Christianity and Evolutionary thinking in        Germany to support their goals.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl>
<dt><strong> <a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_04.html">The Nazi redefinitions of Christianity and Evolution </a></strong> </dt>
<dd> Howard Hershey describes how the Nazis redefined and        influenced Christianity and Evolutionary thinking in        Germany to support their goals.</dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/april-2008-potm-the-nazi-redefinitions-of-christianity-and-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 2008 POTM: Are (non-functional) pseudogenes a product of Intelligent Design?</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/march-2008-potm-are-non-functional-pseudogenes-a-product-of-intelligent-design/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/march-2008-potm-are-non-functional-pseudogenes-a-product-of-intelligent-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard hershey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudogenes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  Are (non-functional) pseudogenes a product of Intelligent Design?  
Howard Hershey argues they are not because most look like copies       of existing genes that have accumulated random mutations with       time, a pattern consistent with an evolutionary process. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl>
<dt><strong> <a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_03.html"> Are (non-functional) pseudogenes a product of Intelligent Design? </a></strong> </dt>
<dd>Howard Hershey argues they are not because most look like copies       of existing genes that have accumulated random mutations with       time, a pattern consistent with an evolutionary process. </dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/march-2008-potm-are-non-functional-pseudogenes-a-product-of-intelligent-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2008 POTM: Saint Augustine on biblical literalism</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/february-2008-potm-saint-augustine-on-biblical-literalism/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/february-2008-potm-saint-augustine-on-biblical-literalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wesley R. Elsberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st. augustine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
  Saint Augustine on biblical literalism  
Vance McAlister (VBM) shows that this fifth century saint       was already pleading that Genesis be interpreted in light of       common knowledge and common sense.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<dl>
<dt><strong> <a href="/origins/postmonth/2008_02.html"> Saint Augustine on biblical literalism </a></strong> </dt>
<dd>Vance McAlister (VBM) shows that this fifth century saint       was already pleading that Genesis be interpreted in light of       common knowledge and common sense.</dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/11/24/february-2008-potm-saint-augustine-on-biblical-literalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2008 POTM: Evidence that Archaeopteryx is transitional from dinosaurs to birds</title>
		<link>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/03/02/january-2008-potm-evidence-that-archaeopteryx-is-transitional-from-dinosaurs-to-birds/</link>
		<comments>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/03/02/january-2008-potm-evidence-that-archaeopteryx-is-transitional-from-dinosaurs-to-birds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TOA News</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TOA PotM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's New]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/03/02/january-2008-potm-evidence-that-archaeopteryx-is-transitional-from-dinosaurs-to-birds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of Talk.Origins regulars; Augray provides a point by point rebuttal of an article      by Duane Gish of ICR which claimed that Archaeopteryx was      essentially a fully modern bird, not a transitional species.
Read it here:
http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/2008_01.html
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Talk.Origins regulars; Augray provides a point by point rebuttal of an article      by Duane Gish of ICR which claimed that Archaeopteryx was      essentially a fully modern bird, not a transitional species.</p>
<p>Read it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/2008_01.html">http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/2008_01.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkorigins.org/whats-new/2008/03/02/january-2008-potm-evidence-that-archaeopteryx-is-transitional-from-dinosaurs-to-birds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

