1. Holm, E., 1958, Dating Our Petroglyphs: The South African Archaeological Bulletin: v. 13, no. 49: p. 34.

BibTeX
@article{holm1958dating,
    author = "Holm, E.",
    title = "Dating Our Petroglyphs",
    year = "1958",
    journal = "The South African Archaeological Bulletin",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/3887599",
    doi = "10.2307/3887599",
    number = "49",
    pages = "34",
    volume = "13"
}

2. Bucha, V, 1971, in Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K., eds., Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist: Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, p. 57-117.

BibTeX
@book{bucha1971in1,
    author = "Bucha, V",
    title = "in Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K., eds., Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist",
    year = "1971",
    publisher = "Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, p. 57-117",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Bucha, V., 1971,, in Michael, H. N., and Ralph, E. K., eds., Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist: Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, p. 57-117.}"
}

3. Heizer, Robert F., 1972, Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist. Von Henry N. Michael und Elizabeth K. Ralph.: American Journal of Archaeology: v. 76, no. 4: p. 456-457.

BibTeX
@article{heizer1972dating,
    author = "Heizer, Robert F.",
    title = "Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist. Von Henry N. Michael und Elizabeth K. Ralph.",
    year = "1972",
    journal = "American Journal of Archaeology",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/502892",
    doi = "10.2307/502892",
    number = "4",
    pages = "456-457",
    volume = "76"
}

4. 1977, Datierung der Petroglyphen am Salton Sea: Science News: v. 111, no. 9: p. 138.

BibTeX
@article{crossref1977dating,
    title = "Dating the Salton Sea Petroglyphs",
    year = "1977",
    journal = "Science News",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/3961578",
    doi = "10.2307/3961578",
    number = "9",
    pages = "138",
    volume = "111"
}

5. Dorn, Ronald I. und Whitley, David S., 1984, Chronometrische und relative Altersbestimmung von Petroglyphen im westlichen Vereinigten Staaten: Annals of the Association of American Geographers: v. 74, no. 2: p. 308-322.

BibTeX
@article{dorn1984chronometric,
    author = "Dorn, Ronald I. und Whitley, David S.",
    title = "Chronometrische und relative Altersbestimmung von Petroglyphen im westlichen Vereinigten Staaten",
    year = "1984",
    journal = "Annals of the Association of American Geographers",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01455.x",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01455.x",
    number = "2",
    pages = "308-322",
    volume = "74"
}

6. Dorn, R. I. und Whitley, D. S, 1984, Chronometrische und relative Altersbestimmung von Petroglyphen in den westlichen Vereinigten Staaten.

BibTeX
@misc{dorn1984chronometric2,
    author = "Dorn, R. I. und Whitley, D. S",
    title = "Chronometrische und relative Altersbestimmung von Petroglyphen in den westlichen Vereinigten Staaten",
    year = "1984",
    howpublished = "Annals, Association of American Geographers, v. 74, p. 308-322",
    note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Dorn, R. I., und Whitley, D. S., 1984, Chronometric and relative age determination of petroglyphs in the Western United States: Annals, Association of American Geographers, v. 74, p. 308-322.}"
}

7. Love, Michael W., 1993, Ceramic Chronology and Chronometric Dating: Ancient Mesoamerica: v. 4, no. 1: p. 17-29.

Zusammenfassung

Die stratigraphische und serielle Analyse der Keramik aus La Blanca, Guatemala, führte zur Definition einer stark verfeinerten Sequenz. Innerhalb der 300 Jahre der Conchas-Phase (ca. 900–600 v. Chr.) ist es möglich, mindestens eine vierteilige Unterteilung zu definieren. Die vierteilige Unterteilung basiert auf einer stratigraphischen Analyse des Vorhandenseins oder Nichtvorhandenseins von sieben Keramiksorten. Allerdings deuten Experimente mit seriellen Methoden darauf hin, dass durch die quantitative Analyse von Attributhäufigkeiten eine höhere Auflösung erzielt werden kann. Die durch diese relativen Datierungsmethoden erhaltene chronologische Auflösung ist mindestens gleich der Auflösung, die mit chronometrischen Methoden möglich ist.

BibTeX
@article{love1993ceramic,
    author = "Love, Michael W.",
    title = "Ceramic Chronology and Chronometric Dating",
    year = "1993",
    journal = "Ancient Mesoamerica",
    abstract = "Stratigraphic and seriational analysis of the ceramics from La Blanca, Guatemala, resulted in the definition of a highly refined sequence. Within the 300 years of the Conchas phase (c. 900–600 b.c.) it is possible to define, minimally, a four-part subdivision. The four-part subdivision is based on a Stratigraphic analysis of the presence or absence of seven ceramic wares. However, experiments with seriational methods suggest that greater resolution may be obtained through the quantitative analysis of attribute frequencies. The chronological resolution obtained by these relative dating methods is at least equal to the resolution possible with chronometric methods.",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956536100000754",
    doi = "10.1017/s0956536100000754",
    number = "1",
    pages = "17-29",
    volume = "4"
}

8. 1997, Chronometric Dating in Archaeology.

BibTeX
@book{crossref1997chronometric,
    title = "Chronometric Dating in Archaeology",
    year = "1997",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9694-0",
    doi = "10.1007/978-1-4757-9694-0"
}

9. 1998, radiometrische Datierung in der Archäologie: Choice Reviews Online: v. 35, no. 09: p. 35-5153-35-5153.

BibTeX
@article{crossref1998chronometric,
    title = "Chronometric dating in archaeology",
    year = "1998",
    journal = "Choice Reviews Online",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-5153",
    doi = "10.5860/choice.35-5153",
    number = "09",
    pages = "35-5153-35-5153",
    volume = "35"
}

10. 2007, Anhang II: Chronometrische Datierungsmethoden: Auswahlkriterien: Archäologische Chemie: S. 449-451.

BibTeX
@misc{crossref2007appendix,
    title = "Anhang II: Chronometrische Datierungsmethoden: Auswahlkriterien",
    year = "2007",
    booktitle = "Archäologische Chemie",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471915256.app2",
    doi = "10.1002/9780471915256.app2",
    pages = "449-451"
}

11. Ward, G. und Tuniz, C., 2015, DATING AUSTRALIAN ROCK-MARKINGS: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CHALLENGE.

BibTeX
@article{s21534771299154424830add7ffaed904069895d3c,
    author = "Ward, G. und Tuniz, C.",
    title = "DATING AUSTRALIAN ROCK-MARKINGS: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CHALLENGE",
    year = "2015",
    url = "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1534771299154424830add7ffaed904069895d3c",
    is_oa = "true",
    semanticscholar_id = "1534771299154424830add7ffaed904069895d3c"
}

12. Banning, Edward B., 2020, Chronometric Dating: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology: S. 327-347.

BibTeX
@incollection{banning2020chronometric,
    author = "Banning, Edward B.",
    title = "Chronometric Dating",
    year = "2020",
    booktitle = "Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47992-3\_20",
    doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-47992-3\_20",
    pages = "327-347"
}

13. 2021, Chronometric Dating: Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: S. 281-281.

BibTeX
@incollection{crossref2021chronometric,
    title = "Chronometric Dating",
    year = "2021",
    booktitle = "Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology",
    url = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58292-0\_30563",
    doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-58292-0\_30563",
    pages = "281-281"
}