1. Wright, C, 1865, Natural Theology as a Positive Science: North American Review, v. 100.
BibTeX
@article{wright1865natural32,
author = "Wright, C",
title = "Natural Theology as a Positive Science",
year = "1865",
journal = "North American Review, v. 100",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Wright, C., 1865, Natural Theology as a Positive Science: North American Review, v. 100.}"
}
2. Hodge, C, 1874, Systematic Theology.
BibTeX
@misc{hodge1874systematic15,
author = "Hodge, C",
title = "Systematic Theology",
year = "1874",
howpublished = "New York",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Hodge, C., 1874, Systematic Theology: New York.}"
}
3. Hopkins, M, 1876, The Evidences of Christianity.
BibTeX
@misc{hopkins1876the16,
author = "Hopkins, M",
title = "The Evidences of Christianity",
year = "1876",
howpublished = "Boston, Mass. [1846]",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Hopkins, M., 1876, The Evidences of Christianity: Boston, Mass. [1846].}"
}
4. Budge, E. A. W, 1895, The Book of the Dead.
BibTeX
@misc{budge1895the3,
author = "Budge, E. A. W",
title = "The Book of the Dead",
year = "1895",
howpublished = "The Papyrus of Ani in the British Museum: New York, Dover, 1967",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Budge, E. A. W., 1895, The Book of the Dead: The Papyrus of Ani in the British Museum: New York, Dover, 1967.}"
}
5. Scofield, C. I, 1896, Rightly Dividing the World of Truth [Revell paper ed.].
BibTeX
@misc{scofield1896rightly25,
author = "Scofield, C. I",
title = "Rightly Dividing the World of Truth [Revell paper ed.]",
year = "1896",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Scofield, C. I., 1896, Rightly Dividing the World of Truth [Revell paper ed.].}"
}
6. White, A. D, 1896, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology.
BibTeX
@misc{white1896a30,
author = "White, A. D",
title = "A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology",
year = "1896",
howpublished = "Gloucester, Mass., Peter Smith, v. 1, 415 p.; Reprinted in 1978 by P. Smith",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {White, A. D., 1896, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology: Gloucester, Mass., Peter Smith, v. 1, 415 p.; Reprinted in 1978 by P. Smith.}"
}
7. Mencken, H. L, 1925, The Hills of Zion, in Cooke, A. 1955, ed., The Vintage Mencken.
BibTeX
@misc{mencken1925the20,
author = "Mencken, H. L",
title = "The Hills of Zion, in Cooke, A. 1955, ed., The Vintage Mencken",
year = "1925",
howpublished = "New York, Vintage Books, p. 153-161",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Mencken, H. L., 1925, The Hills of Zion, in Cooke, A. 1955, ed., The Vintage Mencken: New York, Vintage Books, p. 153-161.}"
}
8. Montague, W. P, 1930, Belief Unbound: A Promethean Religion: New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press.
BibTeX
@book{montague1930belief21,
author = "Montague, W. P",
title = "Belief Unbound",
year = "1930",
publisher = "A Promethean Religion: New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Montague, W. P., 1930, Belief Unbound: A Promethean Religion: New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press.}"
}
9. Dewey, J, 1934, Ein gemeinsamer Glaube.
BibTeX
@misc{dewey1934a8,
author = "Dewey, J",
title = "Ein gemeinsamer Glaube",
year = "1934",
howpublished = "New Haven, Connecticut",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Dewey, J., 1934, Ein gemeinsamer Glaube: New Haven, Connecticut.}"
}
10. 1940, Theologie, Philosophie und Religion: Zeitschrift der American Academy of Religion: v. VIII, no. 1: p. 42-43.
BibTeX
@article{crossref1940theology,
title = "Theologie, Philosophie und Religion",
year = "1940",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Religion",
url = "https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/viii.1.42",
doi = "10.1093/jaarel/viii.1.42",
number = "1",
pages = "42-43",
volume = "VIII"
}
11. DEANE, JOHN PITT, 1941, Religion, Theologie und Philosophie: Journal of the American Academy of Religion: v. IX, no. 1: p. 51-52.
BibTeX
@article{deane1941religion,
author = "DEANE, JOHN PITT",
title = "Religion, Theologie und Philosophie",
year = "1941",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Religion",
url = "https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/ix.1.51",
doi = "10.1093/jaarel/ix.1.51",
number = "1",
pages = "51-52",
volume = "IX"
}
12. Grave, S. A, 1960, The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense.
BibTeX
@misc{grave1960the11,
author = "Grave, S. A",
title = "The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense",
year = "1960",
howpublished = "Oxford",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Grave, S. A., 1960, The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense: Oxford.}"
}
13. Wright, A. D, 1960, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom: New York, Dover Publications; 2 Bände.
BibTeX
@book{wright1960a31,
author = "Wright, A. D",
title = "A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom",
year = "1960",
publisher = "New York, Dover Publications; 2 Bände",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Wright, A. D., 1960, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom: New York, Dover Publications; 2 Bände.}"
}
14. Smart, J. J. C, 1962, The Existance of God, in Abernethy, G. L., and Langford, T. A., eds., Philosophy of Religion.
BibTeX
@misc{smart1962the29,
author = "Smart, J. J. C",
title = "The Existance of God, in Abernethy, G. L., and Langford, T. A., eds., Philosophy of Religion",
year = "1962",
howpublished = "A Book of Readings: New York, Macmillan, 1962, p. 211-220",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Smart, J. J. C., 1962, The Existance of God, in Abernethy, G. L., and Langford, T. A., eds., Philosophy of Religion: A Book of Readings: New York, Macmillan, 1962, p. 211-220.}"
}
15. 1965, Theologie, Religion, Philosophie: Thought: v. 40, no. 4: p. 619-626.
BibTeX
@article{crossref1965theology,
title = "Theologie, Religion, Philosophie",
year = "1965",
journal = "Thought",
url = "https://doi.org/10.5840/thought19654049",
doi = "10.5840/thought19654049",
number = "4",
pages = "619-626",
volume = "40"
}
16. Shideler, E. W, 1966, Believing and Knowing: Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press.
BibTeX
@book{shideler1966believing26,
author = "Shideler, E. W",
title = "Believing and Knowing",
year = "1966",
publisher = "Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Shideler, E. W., 1966, Believing and Knowing: Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press.}"
}
17. 1968, Theologie, Religion, Philosophie: Thought: v. 43, no. 2: p. 303-308.
BibTeX
@article{crossref1968theology,
title = "Theologie, Religion, Philosophie",
year = "1968",
journal = "Thought",
url = "https://doi.org/10.5840/thought196843222",
doi = "10.5840/thought196843222",
number = "2",
pages = "303-308",
volume = "43"
}
18. Ginsberg, H. L, 1969, Ugartische Mythen, Epen und Legenden, in Pritchard, J. B., hrsg., Alte Texte des Nahen Ostens in Beziehung zum Alten Testament [3. Aufl.]: Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, S. 129-155.
BibTeX
@book{ginsberg1969ugartic10,
author = "Ginsberg, H. L",
title = "Ugartische Mythen, Epen und Legenden, in Pritchard, J. B., hrsg., Alte Texte des Nahen Ostens in Beziehung zum Alten Testament [3. Aufl.]",
year = "1969",
publisher = "Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, S. 129-155",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Ginsberg, H. L., 1969, Ugartische Mythen, Epen und Legenden, in Pritchard, J. B., hrsg., Alte Texte des Nahen Ostens in Beziehung zum Alten Testament [3. Aufl.]: Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, S. 129-155.}"
}
19. Robin, H, 1970, African Traditional Thought and Western Science, in Wilson, B. R., ed., Rationality.
BibTeX
@misc{robin1970african24,
author = "Robin, H",
title = "African Traditional Thought and Western Science, in Wilson, B. R., ed., Rationality",
year = "1970",
howpublished = "Oxford, Blackwell, p. 131-171",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Robin, H., 1970, African Traditional Thought and Western Science, in Wilson, B. R., ed., Rationality: Oxford, Blackwell, p. 131-171.}"
}
20. Colloms, B, 1975, Charles Kingsley.
BibTeX
@misc{colloms1975charles5,
author = "Colloms, B",
title = "Charles Kingsley",
year = "1975",
howpublished = "London and New York, Constable and Barnes \& Noble",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Colloms, B., 1975, Charles Kingsley: London and New York, Constable and Barnes \& Noble.}"
}
21. Hesse, M, 1976, Kriterien der Wahrheit in Wissenschaft und Theologie.
BibTeX
@misc{hesse1976criteria14,
author = "Hesse, M",
title = "Kriterien der Wahrheit in Wissenschaft und Theologie",
year = "1976",
howpublished = "Religious Studies, v. 11, p. 385-400",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Hesse, M., 1976, Kriterien der Wahrheit in Wissenschaft und Theologie: Religious Studies, v. 11, p. 385-400.}"
}
22. Hendry, G. S, 1980, The Theology of Nature [1st ed.]: Philadelphia, Westminster Press, 258 p.
BibTeX
@book{hendry1980the13,
author = "Hendry, G. S",
title = "The Theology of Nature [1st ed.]",
year = "1980",
publisher = "Philadelphia, Westminster Press, 258 p",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Hendry, G. S., 1980, The Theology of Nature [1st ed.]: Philadelphia, Westminster Press, 258 p.}"
}
23. Jastrow, R, 1980, Haben Astronomen Gott gefunden?
BibTeX
@misc{jastrow1980have17,
author = "Jastrow, R",
title = "Haben Astronomen Gott gefunden?",
year = "1980",
howpublished = "Reader's Digest, v. 117 (699), S. 49-53",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Jastrow, R., 1980, Haben Astronomen Gott gefunden?: Reader's Digest, v. 117 (699), S. 49-53.}"
}
24. Cox, H, 1981, Religion, in Villoldo, A., and Dychtwald, K., eds., Millennium.
BibTeX
@misc{cox1981religion6,
author = "Cox, H",
title = "Religion, in Villoldo, A., and Dychtwald, K., eds., Millennium",
year = "1981",
howpublished = "Glimpses into the 21st Century: Los Angeles, Ca., J.P. Tarcher, p. 255",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Cox, H., 1981, Religion, in Villoldo, A., and Dychtwald, K., eds., Millennium: Glimpses into the 21st Century: Los Angeles, Ca., J.P. Tarcher, p. 255.}"
}
25. Neville, R. C, 1982, The Tao and the Daimon: Segments of a Religious Inquiry: Albany, State University of New York Press, 281 p.
BibTeX
@book{neville1982the23,
author = "Neville, R. C",
title = "The Tao and the Daimon",
year = "1982",
publisher = "Segments of a Religious Inquiry: Albany, State University of New York Press, 281 p",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Neville, R. C., 1982, The Tao and the Daimon: Segments of a Religious Inquiry: Albany, State University of New York Press, 281 p.}"
}
26. Davies, P, 1983, God and the New Physics.
BibTeX
@misc{davies1983god7,
author = "Davies, P",
title = "God and the New Physics",
year = "1983",
howpublished = "New York, Simon and Schuster",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Davies, P., 1983, God and the New Physics: New York, Simon and Schuster.}"
}
27. Skehan, J. W, 1983, Theologische Grundlage für eine jüdisch-christliche Position zum Kreationismus: Journal of Geological Education, v. 31, p. 307-314.
BibTeX
@article{skehan1983theological27,
author = "Skehan, J. W",
title = "Theologische Grundlage für eine jüdisch-christliche Position zum Kreationismus",
year = "1983",
journal = "Journal of Geological Education, v. 31, p. 307-314",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Skehan, J. W., 1983, Theologische Grundlage für eine jüdisch-christliche Position zum Kreationismus: Journal of Geological Education, v. 31, p. 307-314.}"
}
28. Boulding, K. E, 1984, Toward an Evolutionary Theology, in Montagu, A., ed., Science and Creationism: New York, Oxford University Press, p. 142-148.
BibTeX
@book{boulding1984toward2,
author = "Boulding, K. E",
title = "Toward an Evolutionary Theology, in Montagu, A., ed., Science and Creationism",
year = "1984",
publisher = "New York, Oxford University Press, p. 142-148",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Boulding, K. E., 1984, Toward an Evolutionary Theology, in Montagu, A., ed., Science and Creationism: New York, Oxford University Press, p. 142-148.}"
}
29. Bullough, V. L, 1986, The Need for Friendship Centers.
BibTeX
@misc{bullough1986the4,
author = "Bullough, V. L",
title = "The Need for Friendship Centers",
year = "1986",
howpublished = "Free Inquiry, v. 6, no. 4, p. 14",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Bullough, V. L., 1986, The Need for Friendship Centers: Free Inquiry, v. 6, no. 4, p. 14.}"
}
30. Hanson, R. W, 1986, Wissenschaft und Kreation.
BibTeX
@misc{hanson1986science12,
author = "Hanson, R. W",
title = "Wissenschaft und Kreation",
year = "1986",
howpublished = "Geologische, Theologische und Pädagogische Perspektiven: New York, Macmillan",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Hanson, R. W., 1986, Wissenschaft und Kreation: Geologische, Theologische und Pädagogische Perspektiven: New York, Macmillan.}"
}
31. Moyer, W. A, 1986, Science versus Revealed Truth.
BibTeX
@misc{moyer1986science22,
author = "Moyer, W. A",
title = "Science versus Revealed Truth",
year = "1986",
howpublished = "Meeting the Challenge of Creationism in the Classroom, in Hanson, R. W., ed., Science and Creation: Geological, Theological and Educational Perspectives: New York, Macmillan, p. 46-54",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Moyer, W. A., 1986, Science versus Revealed Truth: Meeting the Challenge of Creationism in the Classroom, in Hanson, R. W., ed., Science and Creation: Geological, Theological and Educational Perspectives: New York, Macmillan, p. 46-54.}"
}
32. Skehan, J. W, 1986, Das Alter der Erde, des Lebens und der Menschheit.
BibTeX
@misc{skehan1986the28,
author = "Skehan, J. W",
title = "The Age of the Earth, of Life, and of Mankind",
year = "1986",
howpublished = "Geology and Biblical Theology versus Creationism, in Hanson, R. W., ed., Science and Creationism: Geological, Theological, and Educational Perspectives: New York, Macmillan, p. 10-32",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Skehan, J. W., 1986, The Age of the Earth, of Life, and of Mankind: Geology and Biblical Theology versus Creationism, in Hanson, R. W., ed., Science and Creationism: Geological, Theological, and Educational Perspectives: New York, Macmillan, p. 10-32.}"
}
33. Freidman, R. E, 1987, Wer hat die Bibel geschrieben?.
BibTeX
@misc{freidman1987who9,
author = "Freidman, R. E",
title = "Wer hat die Bibel geschrieben?",
year = "1987",
howpublished = "New York, Summit Books",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Freidman, R. E., 1987, Wer hat die Bibel geschrieben?: New York, Summit Books.}"
}
34. McIver, T, 1988, Katholische Gegner der Evolution und historische Revisionisten.
BibTeX
@misc{mciver1988catholic19,
author = "McIver, T",
title = "Katholische Gegner der Evolution und historische Revisionisten",
year = "1988",
howpublished = "Creation/Evolution Newsletter, v. 8, p. 15-16",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {McIver, T., 1988, Katholische Gegner der Evolution und historische Revisionisten: Creation/Evolution Newsletter, v. 8, p. 15-16.}"
}
35. Boddy, J, 1990, Wombs and Alien Spirits (Women, Men, and the Zar cult in Northern Sudan): Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press, 399 p.
BibTeX
@book{boddy1990wombs1,
author = "Boddy, J",
title = "Wombs and Alien Spirits (Women, Men, and the Zar cult in Northern Sudan)",
year = "1990",
publisher = "Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press, 399 p",
note = "talkorigins\_source = {true}; raw\_reference = {Boddy, J., 1990, Wombs and Alien Spirits (Women, Men, and the Zar cult in Northern Sudan): Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press, 399 p.}"
}
36. Peperzak, Adriaan, 2001, Philosophie — Religion — Theologie: Themen der zeitgenössischen Religionsphilosophie: S. 29-39.
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0516-6_3
BibTeX
@incollection{peperzak2001philosophy,
author = "Peperzak, Adriaan",
title = "Philosophie — Religion — Theologie",
year = "2001",
booktitle = "Issues in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion",
url = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0516-6\_3",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-010-0516-6\_3",
pages = "29-39"
}
37. Peperzak, Adriaan, 2001, Philosophie–Religion–Theologie: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion: v. 50, no. 1-3: p. 29-39.
BibTeX
@article{peperzak2001philosophyreligiontheology,
author = "Peperzak, Adriaan",
title = "Philosophie–Religion–Theologie",
year = "2001",
journal = "International Journal for Philosophy of Religion",
url = "https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012054101072",
doi = "10.1023/a:1012054101072",
number = "1-3",
pages = "29-39",
volume = "50"
}
38. Hösle, Vittorio, 2003, Religion, Theologie, Philosophie: Philotheos: v. 3: p. 3-13.
BibTeX
@article{hösle2003religion,
author = "Hösle, Vittorio",
title = "Religion, Theologie, Philosophie",
year = "2003",
journal = "Philotheos",
url = "https://doi.org/10.5840/philotheos200331",
doi = "10.5840/philotheos200331",
pages = "3-13",
volume = "3"
}
39. 2013, Religion, Theologie, Philosophie: Gott als Vernunft: S. 137-152.
BibTeX
@incollection{crossref2013religion,
title = "Religion, Theologie, Philosophie",
year = "2013",
booktitle = "Gott als Vernunft",
url = "https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.21996039.9",
doi = "10.2307/jj.21996039.9",
pages = "137-152"
}
40. Milbank, John, 2023, Genealogies of Truth: Theologie, Philosophie und Geschichte: Modern Theology: v. 39, no. 4: p. 708-727.
Zusammenfassung
Die moderne christliche Theologie sucht weiterhin, sich von der historischen Konstitution der Wahrheit zu befreien. Dies widerspricht nicht nur der Inkarnation, sondern hat seine eigenen genealogischen Ursprünge in einem zweifelhaften Verlust der christlichen Philosophie als integraler Unternehmung. Im Allgemeinen kann die Genealogie als negativ oder positiv betrachtet werden. Die negative Genealogie verfolgt entweder einen Bruch mit dem Mythos, wie bei der frühen Philosophie, oder, wie im hinduistischen Denken, einen Bruch mit der spirituellen Dominanz des Einen durch die unvermeidliche Korruption, die vom Vielen verursacht wird. Nietzsche bietet eine seltsame materialistische Version davon, und Heidegger eine nihilistische Mutation desselben „asiatischen" Accounts. Einige Katholiken auf der Rechten betonen stattdessen einen Nietzscheanischen Niedergang durch die Dominanz eines falschen, „geherdeten" Einen und geben die Suprematie der Personlichkeit auf. Die positive Genealogie ist in der Inkarnation verwurzelt, ist zugleich natürlich und kulturell und sucht eine Vermischung des Einen und des Vielen, des Gemeinwohls und des Persönlichen. Das Christentum ist primär einer positiven Genealogie und einer positiven Entwicklung in dieser Hinsicht verpflichtet. Die Theologie kann jedoch eine negative Genealogie nutzen, indem sie gleichzeitig einen Niedergang von der Einheit (wie die hinduistische Erzählung) und einen Niedergang von einer wahrhaft personalistischen Fusion des Einen mit dem Vielen verfolgt, die inhärent eine historische und inkarnierte Generation der Wahrheit beinhaltet.
BibTeX
@article{milbank2023genealogies,
author = "Milbank, John",
title = "Genealogies of Truth: Theology, Philosophy and History",
year = "2023",
journal = "Modern Theology",
abstract = "Die moderne christliche Theologie sucht weiterhin, sich von der historischen Konstitution der Wahrheit zu befreien. Dies widerspricht nicht nur der Inkarnation, sondern hat seine eigenen genealogischen Ursprünge in einem zweifelhaften Verlust der christlichen Philosophie als integraler Unternehmung. Im Allgemeinen kann die Genealogie als negativ oder positiv betrachtet werden. Die negative Genealogie verfolgt entweder einen Bruch mit dem Mythos, wie bei der frühen Philosophie, oder, wie im hinduistischen Denken, einen Bruch mit der spirituellen Dominanz des Einen durch die unvermeidliche Korruption, die vom Vielen verursacht wird. Nietzsche bietet eine seltsame materialistische Version davon, und Heidegger eine nihilistische Mutation desselben „asiatischen" Accounts. Einige Katholiken auf der Rechten betonen stattdessen einen Nietzscheanischen Niedergang durch die Dominanz eines falschen, „geherdeten" Einen und geben die Suprematie der Personlichkeit auf. Die positive Genealogie ist in der Inkarnation verwurzelt, ist zugleich natürlich und kulturell und sucht eine Vermischung des Einen und des Vielen, des Gemeinwohls und des Persönlichen. Das Christentum ist primär einer positiven Genealogie und einer positiven Entwicklung in dieser Hinsicht verpflichtet. Die Theologie kann jedoch eine negative Genealogie nutzen, indem sie gleichzeitig einen Niedergang von der Einheit (wie die hinduistische Erzählung) und einen Niedergang von einer wahrhaft personalistischen Fusion des Einen mit dem Vielen verfolgt, die inhärent eine historische und inkarnierte Generation der Wahrheit beinhaltet.",
url = "https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12830",
doi = "10.1111/moth.12830",
number = "4",
pages = "708-727",
volume = "39"
}