TalkOrigins Search

Intelligent design theory is science.

...appears nowhere in the process of distinguishing design in the sense of "intelligent design." Dembski defined design in terms of what it is not (known regularity and chance), making intelligent design an argument from incredulity ; he never said what design is. A solution to a problem must ad...

.... Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Elsberry, Wesley R., n.d. What does "intelligent agency by proxy" do for the design inference? http://www.talkreason.org/articles/wre_id_proxy.cfm

Intelligent design (ID) is scientific, not religious.

...re's a difference of opinion about how important this debate [advocating intelligent design] is. What I always say is that it's not just scientific theory. The question is best understood as: Is God real or imaginary? (Phillip Johnson, "The Search for Intelligent Design in the Universe", Sili...

...ki, William. 1999. Signs of intelligence: A primer on the discernment of intelligent design. Touchstone 12(4) (Jul/Aug): 76-84. Evans, Skip. 2003. Who promotes Unlocking the Mystery of Life ? http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/6304_who_promotes_iunlocking_the__7_3_2003.asp IVP Online....

Intelligent design (ID) is quite different from creationism, because "Intelligent design creationism" is a pejorative term, not a term used by members of the ID movement. Creationists and fair-minded critics recognize a difference between ID and creationism. ID is scientific. ID's religious implications are distinct from its science program.

The reasons given for ID not being creationism fail: The term "Intelligent design creationism" is used because it is descriptive. The fact that the ID movement does not use it themselves means nothing, because the movement is based on propaganda and image manipulation (Branch 2002;...

....). Dallas, TX: Haughton. Forrest, Barbara. 2002. The wedge at work: How intelligent design creationism is wedging its way into the cultural and academic mainstream. In Pennock, Robert T. (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 5-53. Forrest, Barb...

Intelligent design in biology has been supported by several peer-reviewed journals and books. As of December 2005, intelligent design supporters offer, in support of this claim, the following articles: Axe, D. D., 2000. Extreme functional sensitivity to conservative amino acid changes on enzyme exteriors. Journal of Molecular Biology 301: 585-595. Behe, M. J. and D. W. Snoke. 2004. Simulating evolution by gene duplication of protein features that require multiple amino acid residues. Protein Science 13: 2651-2664. Chiu, D. K. Y. and T. H. Lui. 2002. Integrated use of multiple interdependent patterns for biomolecular sequence analysis. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 4(3): 766-775. Denton, M. J. and J. C. Marshall. 2001. The laws of form revisited. Nature 410: 417. Denton, M. J., J. C. Marshall and M. Legge. 2002. The protein folds as Platonic forms: New support for the pre-Darwinian conception of evolution by natural law. Journal of Theoretical Biology 219: 325-342. Lönnig, W.-E. 2004. Dynamic genomes, morphological stasis and the origin of irreducible complexity . In: V. Parisi, V. de Fonzo and F. Aluffi-Pentini, eds. Dynamical Genetics , 101-119. Research Signpost. Lönnig, W.-E. and H. Saedler. 2002. Chromosome rearrangements and transposable elements. Annual Review of Genetics 36: 389-410. Meyer, Stephen. 2004. The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 117: 213-239. Wells, Jonathan. 2005. Do centrioles generate a polar ejection force? Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 98: 37-62. and books (Discovery Institute 2005): Behe, Michael. 1996. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution . New York: The Free Press. Campbell, John Angus and Stephen C. Meyer. 2003. Darwinism, Design, and Public Education . Michigan State University Press. Denton, Michael. 1985. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis . Adler and Adler. Dembski, W. A. 1998. The Design Inference: Eliminating chance through small probabilities . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dembski, William. 2002. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot be Purchased without Intelligence . Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. Gonzalez, Guillermo and Jay W. Richards. 2004. The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery . Regnery Publishing. Minnich, Scott and Stephen C. Meyer. 2004. Genetic analysis of coordinate flagellar and type III regulatory circuits. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Design and Nature , Rhodes, Greece, ed. M. W. Collins and C. A. Brebbia, WIT Press. Thaxton, Charles B., Walter L. Bradley and Roger L. Olsen. 1984. The Mystery of Life's Origin: Reassessing Current Theories . Philosophical Library. (4th ed., Lewis and Stanley, 1992). The journal Progress in Information, Complexity and Design (PCID) is also peer-reviewed.

...the most generous criteria, the peer-reviewed scientific output from the intelligent design (ID) movement is very low, especially considering the long history and generous funding of the movement. The list of papers and books above is not exhaustive, but there is not a lot else. One week's wo...

...rbara, and Paul R. Gross, 2004. Creationism's Trojan Horse: The wedge of intelligent design . Oxford University Press. Gishlick, Alan, Nick Matzke, and Wesley R. Elsberry, 2004. Meyer's hopeless monster. http://www.pandasthumb.org/pt-archives/000430.html Lynch, John M. 2005. Revisiting Rivist...

Intelligent design has explanatory power, especially given Dembski's "explanatory filter." It accounts for a wide range of biological facts. This makes it scientific.

...ones -- to accept the design hypothesis. Thus it is impossible to apply. Intelligent design remains untestable and impossible to use in practice. Dembski himself has never rigorously applied his filter (Elsberry 2002). "Intelligent" and "design" remain effectively undefined. A theory cannot h...

Elsberry, Wesley R., 2002. Commentary on William A. Dembski's "No Free Lunch: Why specified complexity cannot be purchased without intelligence" http://www.antievolution.org/people/dembski_wa/rev_nfl_wre_bn.html

"The Darwinian mechanism claims the power to transform a single organism . . . into the full diversity of life that we see both around us and in the fossil record. If intelligent design is correct, then the Darwinian mechanism of natural selection and random variation lacks that power" (Dembski 2001).

The claim is a non sequitur. Intelligent design says nothing at all about the Darwinian mechanism of evolution. Whether or not evolution lacks power must be decided by looking at evolution. If intelligent design is correct, it provides an alternativ...

Dembski, William A., 2001. (see above) Previous Claim: CI002 | List of Claims | Next Claim: CI010 created 2001-3-31

Life looks intelligently designed because of its complexity and arrangement. As a watch implies a watchmaker, so life requires a designer.

...y comparing with the results of known designs. The only example of known intelligent design we have is human design. Life does not look man-made. Nobody argues that life is not complicated. However, complexity is not the same as design. There are simple things that are designed and complex th...

Morris, Henry M. 1985. Scientific Creationism . Green Forest, AR: Master Books, pg. 70. Walker, Gabrielle, 2003. The collector. New Scientist 179(2405) (26 July): 38-41.

Just as sciences such as archaeology and forensics can detect design, so it is a valid scientific practice to detect intelligent design in nature. The success of those sciences shows that the methods of intelligent design work in practice.

...ds of archaeology and forensics are unrelated to any methods proposed by intelligent design advocates. Archaeologists and forensic scientists look for patterns that they know, from prior observation, are the sort of patterns that human designers make. The same goes for all other sciences that...

Intelligent Design Humans, Cockroaches, and the Laws of Physics Copyright © 1997 by Victor J. Stenger Preprint of a paper submitted to Creation/Evolution . Do not reprint without permission from the author. Other Links: The Mediocre Universe This Feb. 1996 Dis...

...nstants of nature are so precisely tuned that they could not have occurred without an intelligent designer. Evolution is Not the Whole Story As the bankruptcy of creation "science" becomes increasingly recognized, a new catch phrase, intelligent design , has been adopted by those who persist in their attempts to inject creationism into the scie...

...bankruptcy of creation "science" becomes increasingly recognized, a new catch phrase, intelligent design , has been adopted by those who persist in their attempts to inject creationism into the science curriculum (see, for example, Of Pandas and People , Davis 1993; Matsumura 1995 and Cole 1995 report on attempts to introduce Pandas into school...

Intelligent Design Humans, Cockroaches, and the Laws of Physics by T Copyright © 1997-2003 [Posted: April 23, 1997] [Links updated: June 27, 2003] Preprint of a paper submitted to Creation/Evolution . Do not reprint without permission from the author. Other Li...

...nstants of nature are so precisely tuned that they could not have occurred without an intelligent designer. TalkDesign.org: Critically Examining the "Intelligent Design" Movement A detailed examination of intelligent design creationism. Those looking for criticisms of intelligent design in biology should look here. Evolution is Not the Whole St...

...e occurred without an intelligent designer. TalkDesign.org: Critically Examining the "Intelligent Design" Movement A detailed examination of intelligent design creationism. Those looking for criticisms of intelligent design in biology should look here. Evolution is Not the Whole Story As the bankruptcy of creation "science" becomes increasingly...

Irreducible Complexity and Michael Behe Do Biochemical Machines Show Intelligent Design? Other Links: Molecular Machines: Experimental Support for the Design Inference Michael Behe presents a briefer version of the argument from design that appears in his book. Behe's Empty Box This web page contains many links to web pages sup...

...le biologist Robert Dorit identifies six fallacies that plague Behe's book. Darwin v. Intelligent Design (Again) Biologist H. Allen Orr scathingly critiques Behe's book. Boston Review: Articles on Evolution A number of articles and reviews written by people with several opinions of Behe's book appear here. The Evolution of Vertebrate Blood Clot...

...system. In 1996, the Free Press published a book by Lehigh University biochemist and intelligent design advocate Michael Behe called Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution . The book's central thesis is that many biological systems are "irreducibly complex" at the molecular level. Behe gives the following definition of irre...

Kansas Evolution Hearings Transcripts of an Intelligently-Designed "Kangaroo Court" [Posted: July 1, 2005] Background Other Links: Draft 2 science standards This is the "Majority Report" which would provide a strong science standards endorsed by science organizations. Minority Report website The website...

...ro L. Irigonegaray (for mainstream science) Closing Statement by John H. Calvert (for intelligent design) Copyright Information The transcripts from which the contents of these files were copied from are public documents in the public domain. This HTML adaptation of those transcripts is copyright © 2005 by the TalkOrigins Foundation. Permission...

Kansas Evolution Hearings Transcripts of an Intelligently-Designed "Kangaroo Court" [Posted: July 1, 2005] Background Other Links: Draft 2 science standards This is the "Majority Report" which would provide a strong science standards endorsed by science organizations. Minority Report website The website for the propo...

...etimes called "Scopes II" or the "Dover Panda Trial" by the media. At stake was a pro-intelligent design school board policy and the book Of Pandas and People that first introduced the term "intelligent design" as meaning a specific field of inquiry rather than incidental use as a descriptive term. On December 20, 2005, the court ruled for the...

...school board policy and the book Of Pandas and People that first introduced the term "intelligent design" as meaning a specific field of inquiry rather than incidental use as a descriptive term. On December 20, 2005, the court ruled for the plaintiffs, against the school board, and against intelligent design. The victory was not just legal: the...

...r 20, 2005, the court ruled for the plaintiffs, against the school board, and against intelligent design. The victory was not just legal: the pro-intelligent design school board was replaced by the voters on November 8, 2005. Trial documents Decision of the Court Decision in PDF format (off site) Plaintiffs' Findings of Fact and Conclusions of...

Project Steve Humorous Testing of the Scientific Attitudes Toward "Intelligent Design" Via Scientists Named "Steve" Copyright © 2003 [Posted: May 26, 2003] Since the early Twentieth Century, evolution deniers have been fond of creating lists of "scientists" who do not accept evolution. This tactic is an attempt to give the er...

...agogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools. Other Links: Project Steve: FAQ s NCSE's Frequently Asked Questions document for Project Steve . All About Steve (and Darwin) Glenn Branch and Skip Evans of the NC...

...ations sign a letter opposing an attempt to belittle evolution urged by advocates of "intelligent design" and other forms of evolution denial. The Imminent Demise of Evolution: The Longest Running Falsehood in Creationism Over a century's worth of statements by creationists saying that evolution is in a severe crisis. The Elusive Scientific Bas...

Project Steve Humorous Testing of the Scientific Attitudes Toward "Intelligent Design" Via Scientists Named "Steve" Copyright © 2003 [Posted: May 26, 2003] [Last update: October 3, 2003] Since the early Twentieth Century, evolution deniers have been fond of creating lists of "scientists" who do not accept evolution. This tact...

...agogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools. Other Links: Project Steve: FAQ s NCSE's Frequently Asked Questions document for Project Steve . All About Steve (and Darwin) Glenn Branch and Skip Evans of the NC...

...ations sign a letter opposing an attempt to belittle evolution urged by advocates of "intelligent design" and other forms of evolution denial. The Imminent Demise of Evolution: The Longest Running Falsehood in Creationism Over a century's worth of statements by creationists saying that evolution is in a severe crisis. The Elusive Scientific Bas...

...ing Functional Complexity in Nature Do the life sciences need a theory of design? Why Intelligent Design Isn't Science Rejection of Intelligent Design is not based on naturalism. Irreducible Complexity and Michael Behe Critiques of Behe's arguments. ID-Commentaries Point-by-point responses to some of Dembski's articles. Contents Summary 1. Intr...

...e sciences need a theory of design? Why Intelligent Design Isn't Science Rejection of Intelligent Design is not based on naturalism. Irreducible Complexity and Michael Behe Critiques of Behe's arguments. ID-Commentaries Point-by-point responses to some of Dembski's articles. Contents Summary 1. Introduction 2. Design and Nature 3. The Chance-El...

...nferring design in biology, and will probably play a central role in the promotion of Intelligent Design pseudoscience 2 over the next few years. It is the most comprehensive exposition of his arguments to date. The purpose of the current critique is to provide a thorough critical examination of these arguments. Dembski himself has often compla...